2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.901908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Blood Clotting After Rewarming From Experimental Hypothermia in an Intact Porcine Model

Abstract: Introduction: Due to functional alterations of blood platelets and coagulation enzymes at low temperatures, excessive bleeding is a well-recognized complication in victims of accidental hypothermia and may present a great clinical challenge. Still, it remains largely unknown if hemostatic function normalizes upon rewarming. The aim of this study was to investigate effects of hypothermia and rewarming on blood coagulation in an intact porcine model.Methods: The animals were randomized to cooling and rewarming (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with all animal models, our data is subject to certain restrictions: Although porcine models have great benefits for immunologic research, the inflammatory response may not be identical and inter-species differences have to be taken into account [ 63 ]. Furthermore, the coagulation system in pigs is different compared to humans [ 64 ], and hypothermia (accidental or therapeutic) may affect the physiologic cascade [ 65 ]. We did not include survival as an outcome parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with all animal models, our data is subject to certain restrictions: Although porcine models have great benefits for immunologic research, the inflammatory response may not be identical and inter-species differences have to be taken into account [ 63 ]. Furthermore, the coagulation system in pigs is different compared to humans [ 64 ], and hypothermia (accidental or therapeutic) may affect the physiologic cascade [ 65 ]. We did not include survival as an outcome parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%