2001
DOI: 10.1049/ip-com:20010618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Birkhoff–von Neumann decomposition algorithm for input queued switches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for the region where both DOUBLE and ADAPT are feasible (i.e., ), from (15) and (16), it is easy to prove that is always true. Therefore, for the same set of switch parameters , , and , the overall speedup required by ADAPT is always smaller than that required by DOUBLE (except or , where ).…”
Section: B Performance Comparison With Doublementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even for the region where both DOUBLE and ADAPT are feasible (i.e., ), from (15) and (16), it is easy to prove that is always true. Therefore, for the same set of switch parameters , , and , the overall speedup required by ADAPT is always smaller than that required by DOUBLE (except or , where ).…”
Section: B Performance Comparison With Doublementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in (16), in (15), and in (22). For simplicity, we focus on an optical switch with a given switch size and a given reconfiguration overhead .…”
Section: Where (22)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the ILP, and are general integer variables [27], is a binary variable, and is the maximum line sum of the matrix The sum of the weights is minimized in (17). Constraints (18) and (19) define each configuration as a permutation matrix.…”
Section: Appendix a Ilp Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, traffic matrix decomposition is a classic problem [8]- [17]. Algorithms based on Hall's theorem [14] or Birkhoff-von Neumann decomposition [12], [13], [15]- [17] generate a large number of configurations (e.g., in Birkhoff-von Neumann decomposition), and thus are only favorable in scheduling problems without reconfiguration overhead. For scheduling problems with reconfiguration overhead, greedy algorithms such as LIST [7], [8], [18] and decompositions based on graph theory [7]- [9] are invented with a smaller number of configurations in the schedule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%