2018
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Biogas Production From Anaerobic Co-digestion of Lignocellulosic Biomass and Poultry Feces Using Source Separated Human Urine as Buffering Agent

Abstract: Effect of source separated human urine as buffering agent compared to sodium bicarbonate and water in anaerobic co-digestion of lignocellulosic biomass and poultry feces was evaluated in laboratory scale reactor for 180 days at 37 ± 2 • C. Mean biogas volume ranged from 37 ± 8 to 101 ± 18 mL gVS −1 in the urine buffered reactors which was 1-5 times higher than the bicarbonate and water buffered reactors and the difference was significant at p = 0. 05. Total volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration ranged betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental design of Alrawi et al (2011) was adopted with some modifications in incubation temperature, retention time and reactor design. Four sets of laboratory-scale reactors described elsewhere (Eduok et al, 2018) with a capacity of 100 ml and a working volume of 80 ml were fed with varying proportions of the waste mixtures in duplicate and labelled A to D as follows: A = 75 g SCC + 5 ml CU; B = 70 g SCC + 10 ml CU; C = 65 g SCC + 15 ml CU; and D (control) = 80 g SCC. To each digester, 5 g of ADS (inoculum) was added and operated at 45 ± 2°C in a thermostatic water bath maintained over a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 42 days until no significant biogas production was achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental design of Alrawi et al (2011) was adopted with some modifications in incubation temperature, retention time and reactor design. Four sets of laboratory-scale reactors described elsewhere (Eduok et al, 2018) with a capacity of 100 ml and a working volume of 80 ml were fed with varying proportions of the waste mixtures in duplicate and labelled A to D as follows: A = 75 g SCC + 5 ml CU; B = 70 g SCC + 10 ml CU; C = 65 g SCC + 15 ml CU; and D (control) = 80 g SCC. To each digester, 5 g of ADS (inoculum) was added and operated at 45 ± 2°C in a thermostatic water bath maintained over a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 42 days until no significant biogas production was achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AD was performed in a lab-scale batch system using amber borosilicate glass serum bottles (100 mL capacity) (Wheaton 223,766, USA) and 20 mm aluminium crimp seal with PTFE/Butyl septa for headspace vial (Wheaton W224224, USA) as reactors [12]. The experimental design of Cater et al [20] was adopted for the anaerobic codigestion and manure supplementation assay.…”
Section: Batch Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the AD process is very complex involving different groups of microorganisms with various environmental requirements, any adjustment in one or more of these operating conditions will influence the growth and performance of the microorganisms and hence the yield and quality of the biogas and digestate [9]. Certain waste/residues with complementary properties can be codigested anaerobically to achieve elevated biogas yields [10][11][12]. The biogas generated from AD processes has been utilized as a source of renewable energy in many developed countries with potentials for heating, electricity and vehicle fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lignocellulosic biomass was subjected to wet anaerobic digestion with free moisture from wash water as a wetting agent in 100 ml amber serum bottles bioreactors (amber borosilicate glass serum bottles, Wheaton 223766, USA) with 20 mm aluminum cap with PTFE/Butyl septa vial headspace (Wheaton W224224, USA)for biogas accumulation. The biogas assay was set up in a batch condition whereby the mixture of feedstock and inoculum were charged once into the bioreactors [14]. The experimental design and initial reactor composition are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set-ups were incubated at 45ºC ± 2ºC in a thermostatically regulated water bath with 5 minutes of daily manual agitation for 25 days until no biogas was detected from the reactors. At 3 days interval, the evolved gas was determined by volumetric method by connecting each reactor to a cylinder device at reverse position and liquid displacement was measured and biogas volume was calculated using the expression [14]:…”
Section: Experimental Design and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%