2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00043-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using nonionic surfactants in soil slurry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of a surfactant to a contaminated soil can reduce the interfacial tension thus increasing the mass transfer of the contaminants (Mulligan et al, 2001;Gao et al, 2007;. In this context, several researchers have shown that various surfactants can enhance desorption (Aronstein et al, 1991;MataSandoval et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2006), solubilization (Garon et al, 2002;Prak and Pritchard, 2002;Doong and Lei, 2003), biodegradation of organic compounds (Fava and Di Gioia, 2001;Kim et al, 2001), and removal of heavy metals from soil (Dahrazma and Mulligan, 2007;Rufino et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a surfactant to a contaminated soil can reduce the interfacial tension thus increasing the mass transfer of the contaminants (Mulligan et al, 2001;Gao et al, 2007;. In this context, several researchers have shown that various surfactants can enhance desorption (Aronstein et al, 1991;MataSandoval et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2006), solubilization (Garon et al, 2002;Prak and Pritchard, 2002;Doong and Lei, 2003), biodegradation of organic compounds (Fava and Di Gioia, 2001;Kim et al, 2001), and removal of heavy metals from soil (Dahrazma and Mulligan, 2007;Rufino et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within soil, black carbon materials such as biochar influence the bioavailability and bioaccessibility of these compounds through sorption and entrapment. This influence can be observed through the rates and extents of sorption, desorption and biodegradation of HOCs in biochar-amended soils, whilst the biochar concentration, production conditions, feedstock and chemical properties are also determining factors [28,65,127]. Despite the presence of co-contaminants, biochar still strongly affected the total and bioavailable fractions of PAHs [126,127].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In so doing, removal of the putatively mobile fraction which consists of the easily extractable and/or bioavailable/bioaccessible HOC fractions diminishes with increasing soil contact time [25][26][27]. Persistence and loss are also governed by the characteristics of the HOC, such as polarity, hydrophobicity, aqueous solubility and molecular structure or size [10,17,27,28]. Increases in contaminant-soil contact time (aging), result in the rate of loss decreasing to produce a hockey stick-shaped decay curve [10,24] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Behaviour Of Organic Contaminants In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since inhibition of Phe degradation was not observed in the TC samples, it could be inferred that the volatilisation and/or degradation of naphthalene may have occurred more rapidly compared to the nutrient amended microcosms, thereby preventing any form of inhibitory action on the degradation of other LMW PAHs. It is also possible that losses recorded for Phe in these un-amended samples may have also occurred by volatilization [30]. In the TBN treatments, the mean concentration of naphthalene after 60 days incubation was, however, significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control and Phe inhibition was also observed.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Pahs (µG/g)mentioning
confidence: 91%