2007
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced amygdala and medial prefrontal activation during nonconscious processing of fear in posttraumatic stress disorder: An fMRI study

Abstract: Biological models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) suggest that patients will display heightened amygdala but decreased medial prefrontal activity during processing of fear stimuli. However, a rapid and automatic alerting mechanism for responding to nonconscious signals of fear suggests that PTSD may display heightened rather than decreased MPFC under nonconscious processing of fear stimuli. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine blood oxygenation level-dependent signal changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
161
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
16
161
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased regional activity and reduced functional connectivity in frontolimbic and striatal regions occurred in areas known to be important for emotion processing (22). Atypical function in these areas has been implicated in previous studies of patients with chronic stress- related disorders (5,6,8,12,23) and was related to the reported level of emotional distress in our sample. Thus, the present investigation expands understanding of stress-related changes of brain function in humans in two important ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increased regional activity and reduced functional connectivity in frontolimbic and striatal regions occurred in areas known to be important for emotion processing (22). Atypical function in these areas has been implicated in previous studies of patients with chronic stress- related disorders (5,6,8,12,23) and was related to the reported level of emotional distress in our sample. Thus, the present investigation expands understanding of stress-related changes of brain function in humans in two important ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Human studies (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) have focused primarily on patients who already have an established psychiatric disorder, such as ASD and PTSD. Despite some inconsistencies (6,7,(9)(10)(11), findings from clinical studies also implicate limbic, paralimbic, striatal, and prefrontal structures in the pathophysiology of stress-related psychiatric disorders. However, because the majority of these studies were performed with victims of trauma that took place years or even decades earlier, it is not clear whether this represents a slowly evolving pattern of brain alteration or one that emerges shortly after traumatic experiences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, OT administration increased resting-state functional connectivity between the amygdala and vmPFC in healthy males (Sripada et al, 2013) and in males with GSAD, normalizing the diminished functional connectivity observed under placebo in GSAD patients (Dodhia et al, 2014). Notably, higher amygdala reactivity in PTSD patients before treatment predicted worse treatment outcome, possibly due to (more) impaired extinction learning and fear regulation (Bryant et al, 2008b). Additionally, vmPFC-amygdala connectivity is important in fear extinction learning (Milad et al, 2007), assumed to be the underlying mechanism of exposure therapy in PTSD (Rothbaum and Davis, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The fact that emotional faces were presented for only 33 ms (i.e., without the subject's conscious awareness of their display) may have minimized the role of the mPFC, justifying the absence of results regarding these high-order areas (Williams et al, 2006). However, another work that used masked faces in a shorter period of time (16.7 ms) found not only amygdala activation in response to fearful faces but also activation of the mPFC (Bryant et al, 2008). Armony, Corbo, Clement, and Brunet (2005) examined the amygdala response to the visualization of happy and fearful facial expressions.…”
Section: Processing Of Nontrauma-related Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%