1999
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v94.9.3234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engraftment Kinetics After Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: Full Donor T-Cell Chimerism Precedes Alloimmune Responses

Abstract: Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation has recently been explored as a safer alternative to conventional high-dose transplant regimens. Although a high incidence of mixed chimerism after nonmyeloablative procedures has been reported, the exact kinetics of engrafting donor cells in specific cellular lineages has yet to be defined. We investigated lineage-specific chimerism in 15 patients receiving an allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant from an HLA-identical (n = 14) or a 5/6 a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
100
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 485 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
100
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study reports on our further evaluation of the ability of this device and the integral MNC software program to collect a variety of MNCs that can subsequently be separated into subsets by appropriate cell‐sorting techniques. Efficient collection of purified MNCs is becoming more important therapeutically, with the expanding role of MNCs in clinical practice 1–16 . Optimizing the CE and the quantity and purity of cells obtained by apheresis is a problem often compounded by concerns over the decreasing availability of apheresis donors and the decreasing time available for a healthy volunteer donor to devote to an apheresis collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study reports on our further evaluation of the ability of this device and the integral MNC software program to collect a variety of MNCs that can subsequently be separated into subsets by appropriate cell‐sorting techniques. Efficient collection of purified MNCs is becoming more important therapeutically, with the expanding role of MNCs in clinical practice 1–16 . Optimizing the CE and the quantity and purity of cells obtained by apheresis is a problem often compounded by concerns over the decreasing availability of apheresis donors and the decreasing time available for a healthy volunteer donor to devote to an apheresis collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also used for treating posttransplant EBV‐positive lymphoma and CMV infections 6,9–11 . Additional indications for DLI include control of GVHD and conservation of the graft‐versus‐leukemia effect, 12 promotion of graft‐versus‐malignancy, 13–15 and displacement of residual host HPCs in recurrent sickle cell anemia after allogeneic BMT 16 . Dendritic cells (DCs) are considered to be the most efficient antigen‐presenting cells and the most potent for initiation of the immune response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative analysis of chimerism by determination of the ratio of donor to recipient's cells is used to monitor the post‐transplantation period and could potentially determine the relapse of the underlying disease as early possible [6, 7]. Different methods are available including restriction fragment length polymorphism [8, 9], interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the case of sex mismatched Allo‐SCT [10–13], polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for short‐tandem‐repeats (STR) or variable number tandem repeats [9, 14], and finally real‐time quantitative PCR (RQ‐PCR) for donor‐ and recipient‐specific polymorphisms [15–17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that, after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), cure of CML and Philadelphia chromosome‐positive ALL depends on the contribution of the graft‐versus‐leukemia (GVL) effect [14, , –17]. This notion prompted the development of allogeneic transplantation after reduced‐intensity [18, 20] or truly nonmyeloablative conditioning [21, , , , , 27]. In these approaches, the conditioning regimen is substantially reduced, and reliance is placed on GVL effects for eradicating host leukemic cells [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%