English-to-Spanish Translation of the Nijmegen Professionalism Scale

Abstract

Background and purpose:The aim of this investigation was to perform the cross-cultural and linguistic translation and adaptation of the Nijmegen Professionalism Scale for Spanish nursing. Originally designed by Tromp et al. (2010) for its use by general practitioners, the new Spanish version of this tool assesses professional commitment, allowing for the comparison, prevention, association, and longitudinal monitoring of commitment among nursing professionals.Methods:The linguistic translation from English to Spanish was performed using the translation–back-translation method; the process of cross-cultural adaptation to the Spanish nursing context was carried out following the recommendations given by a panel of experts comprised of 24 practicing nurses with different professional backgrounds. The data for the feasibility study were collected between December 2015 and January 2016.Results:The original English version of the instrument contains 106 items and was originally developed for assessing professional behavior of general practitioner trainees; the new version, with a significant reduction in the initial number of items, comprises 49 items and is now ready for pilot testing and validation in our context.Implications for practice:The Nijmegen Professionalism Scale in its Spanish version will act not only as a tool for measuring professional commitment among Spanish nurses but also as a motivational resource and means for reflection which will, in turn, increase the quality of the care provided by these professionals.

Pilot Testing and Psychometric Validation of the Nijmegen Professionalism Scale for Spanish Nursing

“…The process of cross-cultural and linguistic translation and adaptation of the NPS-S and the assessment of content and face validity have been described in a previous study (García-Moyano et al, 2019). We used (Terwee et al, 2007) quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires, with the exception of the final phase, interpretability, which was not addressed as it was beyond the aims of this study.…”