2016
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1198762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

English for Specific Purposes and Academic Literacies: eclecticism in academic writing pedagogy

Abstract: Academic Literacies and English for Specific Purposes perspectives on the teaching of academic writing tend to be positioned as dichotomous and ideologically incompatible. Nonetheless, recent studies have called for the integration of these two perspectives in the design of writing programmes in order to meet the needs of students in the increasingly diverse and shifting landscape of academia. The aim of the present paper is to reflect on how this theoretical integration could be put into practice. Drawing on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the vast majority of HE research on academic literacy, which deals with theories underpinning practice (e.g. Lea and Street 2006;McGrath and Kaufhold 2016;Swales 1990), student learning (e.g. Cheng 2018;Johns 2008;Negretti 2017), and the training of EAP lecturers (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the vast majority of HE research on academic literacy, which deals with theories underpinning practice (e.g. Lea and Street 2006;McGrath and Kaufhold 2016;Swales 1990), student learning (e.g. Cheng 2018;Johns 2008;Negretti 2017), and the training of EAP lecturers (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…University students who rely heavily on information found on the web must weave into their own writing with quotes and paraphrases to show how they have acquired new knowledge (Beaudet, 2015). Many students have come to appreciate the extra aid given by online dictionaries (Peters, Weinberg, Sarma, students who are not native speakers such as English for academic purposes (Wingate & Tribble, 2012) or English for specific purposes (McGrath & Kaufhold, 2016).…”
Section: Writing Skills Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, ESP courses, which (unlike EMI) are not explicitly addressed by internationalisation policies, 'survive' in new curricula depending on their traditional presence and on the question of how much room can be made in new curricula for 'ancillary' subjects like languages (an explanation that stems from the elective nature of ESP courses), and which takes us back to Swales et al's (2001) notion of 'fragility'. Such a view, together with the apparent lack of coordination between content and language lecturers, neglects the potential of ESP (especially EAP) to prepare undergraduate students for participation in EMI (Terraschke & Wahid, 2011), to hone their disciplinary academic skills through situated EAP teaching (McGrath & Kaufhold, 2016), and to raise awareness about intercultural communicative competence while teaching English for specific purposes (Aguilar, 2018). Considering the weight that content courses have in new curricula, and the unequal power relations between large departments responsible for disciplines that are central to the degree and the limited number of ESP faculty available, it is not surprising to find ESP being overshadowed by EMI.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%