2019
DOI: 10.26577/ejph.2020.v180.i4.ph1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

English anthroponyms: their features and usage as a linguistic resource

Abstract: The article touches upon the teaching a foreign language in secondary schools is a communicative orientation. Knowledge gained in the course of acquaintance with such a narrow topic as "anthroponyms in English" contributes to a more conscious approach to the process of learning English and can help the student to be more interested in the work process. As it is known, anthroponyms have a special place in any culture, including English, so it is imperative to know their use in speech, since it is difficult to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been stated above, the research in the field of anthroponymic sobriquets in terms of primary and secondary nomination processes is referred to the emergence of new meanings and structures with respect to the associative nature of human consciousness, where linguistic sign multifunctionality should be taken into particular consideration. The linguistic units under analysis find their representation in various discourses and fulfill different functions depending on the communicative-pragmatic characteristics of the corresponding text, alongside their own expressive-evaluative loading, which they possess due to their originality (Hlushchenko et al, 2021;Ismailov et al, 2022;Madiyeva, Karaman, 2021). For example, in the world cultural space whose representations can be manifested by literary discourse, including literary analysis and criticism, the units of secondary nomination may be used to distinguish prominent features of the authors widespread at the level of public opinion (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been stated above, the research in the field of anthroponymic sobriquets in terms of primary and secondary nomination processes is referred to the emergence of new meanings and structures with respect to the associative nature of human consciousness, where linguistic sign multifunctionality should be taken into particular consideration. The linguistic units under analysis find their representation in various discourses and fulfill different functions depending on the communicative-pragmatic characteristics of the corresponding text, alongside their own expressive-evaluative loading, which they possess due to their originality (Hlushchenko et al, 2021;Ismailov et al, 2022;Madiyeva, Karaman, 2021). For example, in the world cultural space whose representations can be manifested by literary discourse, including literary analysis and criticism, the units of secondary nomination may be used to distinguish prominent features of the authors widespread at the level of public opinion (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been stated above, the research in the field of anthroponymic sobriquets in terms of primary and secondary nomination processes is referred to the emergence of new meanings and structures with respect to the associative nature of human consciousness, where linguistic sign multifunctionality should be taken into particular consideration. The linguistic units under analysis find their representation in various discourses and fulfill different functions depending on the communicative-pragmatic characteristics of the corresponding text, alongside their own expressive-evaluative loading, which they possess due to their originality (Hlushchenko et al, 2021;Ismailov et al, 2022;Madiyeva, Karaman, 2021). For example, in the world cultural space whose representations can be manifested by literary discourse, including literary analysis and criticism, the units of secondary nomination may be used to distinguish prominent features of the authors widespread at the level of public opinion (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%