2012
DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2012.661623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineers versus managers: experts, market-making and state-building in Putin's Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This doesn’t mean that governments relinquish authority. Financialization has served to strengthen the state by using electricity markets to centralize authority in Russia (Wengle, 2012), and by providing the state with a ready source of potential revenue in Australia (O’Neill, 2013). Here, the relevance of the ‘growth machine’ approach becomes clear, as it looks beyond specific infrastructures to broader processes linking public and private sector actors and geographies of the state (Kirkpatrick and Smith, 2011; Hall and Jonas, 2014).…”
Section: Hype or Happening?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This doesn’t mean that governments relinquish authority. Financialization has served to strengthen the state by using electricity markets to centralize authority in Russia (Wengle, 2012), and by providing the state with a ready source of potential revenue in Australia (O’Neill, 2013). Here, the relevance of the ‘growth machine’ approach becomes clear, as it looks beyond specific infrastructures to broader processes linking public and private sector actors and geographies of the state (Kirkpatrick and Smith, 2011; Hall and Jonas, 2014).…”
Section: Hype or Happening?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In responding thus to the increasing institutional diversity of capitalist developmental paths, the paper contributes to the emerging literature in comparative capitalisms that sees 'illiberal' variants of capitalist development not as a perennial contest between state and market actors, but rather as a dynamic interpenetration of private and public sector actors (see also Wengle, 2012). As I have argued here, this interpenetration is embedded in historical lineages, residual patterns of socio-cultural relations and existing institutional arrangements that determine how the uncertain nexus of state and market comes to be filled in with stable, uncertainty-reducing expectations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Koray Çalıșkan and Michel Callon ( a ; b ), I understand future‐making in terms of an interplay of institutions, material entities, socialization practices, and ways of seeing and speaking that serve to establish authority (see also Boyer ; Carr ). Susanne Wengle (), for instance, also frames this interplay in terms of market‐shaping phenomena by describing shifts in the Russian power sector which have contributed to a transnational process of cultural evaluation constructed and configured by agents engaged in valuation practices.…”
Section: Of Quantities and Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%