2024
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering tRNAs for the Ribosomal Translation of Non-proteinogenic Monomers

Maxwell Sigal,
Satomi Matsumoto,
Adam Beattie
et al.

Abstract: Ribosome-dependent protein biosynthesis is an essential cellular process mediated by transfer RNAs (tRNAs). Generally, ribosomally synthesized proteins are limited to the 22 proteinogenic amino acids (pAAs: 20 L-α-amino acids present in the standard genetic code, selenocysteine, and pyrrolysine). However, engineering tRNAs for the ribosomal incorporation of non-proteinogenic monomers (npMs) as building blocks has led to the creation of unique polypeptides with broad applications in cellular biology, material s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 635 publications
(1,442 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flexibility of the anticodon stem-loop, largely influenced by base pair 31:39 and non-canonical interactions between nucleotide 32:38 ( Auffinger and Westhof, 1999 ), impacts this decoding efficiency and codon recognition specificity ( Olejniczak et al, 2005 ; Ledoux and Uhlenbeck, 2008 ; Sigal et al, 2024 ). “Stiffer” anticodon arms result from G:C base pairs at these positions, generally distorting the canonical anticodon loop conformation and disrupting the binding of GC-rich codons ( Olejniczak et al, 2005 ; Olejniczak and Uhlenbeck, 2006 ; Murakami et al, 2009 ), whereas weaker interactions, including the rare A32:U38 interaction, allows easier codon-anticodon base pairing ( Ledoux et al, 2009 ; Schmeing et al, 2011 ; Grosjean and Westhof, 2016 ).…”
Section: Improving Codon-anticodon Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The flexibility of the anticodon stem-loop, largely influenced by base pair 31:39 and non-canonical interactions between nucleotide 32:38 ( Auffinger and Westhof, 1999 ), impacts this decoding efficiency and codon recognition specificity ( Olejniczak et al, 2005 ; Ledoux and Uhlenbeck, 2008 ; Sigal et al, 2024 ). “Stiffer” anticodon arms result from G:C base pairs at these positions, generally distorting the canonical anticodon loop conformation and disrupting the binding of GC-rich codons ( Olejniczak et al, 2005 ; Olejniczak and Uhlenbeck, 2006 ; Murakami et al, 2009 ), whereas weaker interactions, including the rare A32:U38 interaction, allows easier codon-anticodon base pairing ( Ledoux et al, 2009 ; Schmeing et al, 2011 ; Grosjean and Westhof, 2016 ).…”
Section: Improving Codon-anticodon Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact impact of adding or removing a modification across different tRNAs is not well understood, and some unmodified tRNAs can still function ( Phizicky and Alfonzo, 2010 ; Lorenz et al, 2017 ). One heuristic approximation is that GC-rich decoding tRNAs are modified to reduce binding affinity whereas AU-rich decoding tRNAs are modified to improve codon binding ( Uhlenbeck and Schrader, 2018 ; Sigal et al, 2024 ). One recent example improved the UAG decoding efficiency of a previously engineered opt tRNA CUA Tyr ( Young et al, 2010 ) by replacing adenine with 2, 6-diaminopurine (D) at positions 31 and 36 ( Mala and Saraogi, 2022 ).…”
Section: Improving Codon-anticodon Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations