2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2285-8_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases Using Yeast Surface Display

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further investigate the MMP‐3cd inhibition of minimal TIMP variants, enzyme inhibition assays were performed using soluble active MMP‐3cd protein soluble minimal TIMP variant peptides, and soluble N‐TIMP‐1 protein as reference. The tight inhibition binding assays were performed using an MMP cleavable fluorogenic substrate (Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh et al, 2022; Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh, Greene, et al, 2019; Toumaian & Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh, 2022). The minimal TIMP variants, mTC1, mTC2, and mTC3 showed the inhibition constants in the picomolar range (323–568 pM) with mTC1 having the lowest K i and mTC3 the highest value compared to N‐TIMP (385 pM) which were consistent with the data previously reported for TIMPs (Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh et al, 2022) and yeast surface display binding data (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To further investigate the MMP‐3cd inhibition of minimal TIMP variants, enzyme inhibition assays were performed using soluble active MMP‐3cd protein soluble minimal TIMP variant peptides, and soluble N‐TIMP‐1 protein as reference. The tight inhibition binding assays were performed using an MMP cleavable fluorogenic substrate (Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh et al, 2022; Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh, Greene, et al, 2019; Toumaian & Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh, 2022). The minimal TIMP variants, mTC1, mTC2, and mTC3 showed the inhibition constants in the picomolar range (323–568 pM) with mTC1 having the lowest K i and mTC3 the highest value compared to N‐TIMP (385 pM) which were consistent with the data previously reported for TIMPs (Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh et al, 2022) and yeast surface display binding data (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding between bMMP‐3 and N‐TIMP‐1 or minimal TIMP variants was performed on the yeast surface similar to protocols done previously (Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh et al, 2022; Toumaian & Raeeszadeh‐Sarmazdeh, 2022). The yeast cells displaying N‐TIMP‐1 or minimal TIMP variants were grown and induced as previously described in SD‐CAA (pH 6) media at 30°C shaker and induced in SG‐CAA media at 30°C for 20 h. The induced yeast cells were pelleted at OD 600 of 0.4 by centrifuge at 5000 Xg for 4 min at 4°C and washed three times with PBSA buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations