2021
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering the Turnover Stability of Cellobiose Dehydrogenase toward Long-Term Bioelectronic Applications

Abstract: Cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) is an attractive oxidoreductase for bioelectrochemical applications. Its two-domain structure allows the flavoheme enzyme to establish direct electron transfer to biosensor and biofuel cell electrodes. Yet, the application of CDH in these devices is impeded by its limited stability under turnover conditions. In this work, we aimed to improve the turnover stability of CDH by semirational, high-throughput enzyme engineering. We screened 13 736 colonies in a 96-well plate setup for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The K M,app of 37.9±5.4 mM obtained for the optimized MET biosensor is similar to the value of 36±1 mM reported for a WT Ch CDH DET biosensor [21] . However, the j max value of 719±43 μA cm −2 achieved with the MET biosensor is 15‐fold higher than the 47 μA cm −2 obtained for that DET biosensor, [21] and more than 30‐fold higher than that obtained for the optimized WT Ch CDH DET biosensor reported on here. This higher j max value results in 17‐fold increased sensitivity, and a wider linear range, to glucose for the MET biosensor over the WT Ch CDH DET biosensor operating in PBS (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The K M,app of 37.9±5.4 mM obtained for the optimized MET biosensor is similar to the value of 36±1 mM reported for a WT Ch CDH DET biosensor [21] . However, the j max value of 719±43 μA cm −2 achieved with the MET biosensor is 15‐fold higher than the 47 μA cm −2 obtained for that DET biosensor, [21] and more than 30‐fold higher than that obtained for the optimized WT Ch CDH DET biosensor reported on here. This higher j max value results in 17‐fold increased sensitivity, and a wider linear range, to glucose for the MET biosensor over the WT Ch CDH DET biosensor operating in PBS (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…While K M,app values for biosensors are influenced by the physicochemical properties of the films on the surface and the differences in enzyme immobilization methods, the K M,app value for the WT Ch CDH DET biosensor is nearly 3‐fold lower than the value of 36±1 mM reported for a WT Ch CDH DET biosensor prepared by drop‐coating 1 μL of a 15 mg mL −1 WT Ch CDH solution on electrodes [21] . As a consequence the linear range of 0–5 mM and j max of 21.8±0.3 μA cm −2 for the DET biosensor based on an enzyme volume of 18 μL (180 μg), Figure 3 and Table 1, are lower than the 0–10 mM and 47 μA cm −2 obtained at the WT Ch CDH DET biosensor from a previous report [21] . Signal sensitivity is, however, similar for both type of electrodes at ∼1 μA cm −2 mM −1 (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations