“…In addition to meso ‐substituents, the atomic charge of the metal center and the electronic structure of the ligand systems can be controlled by axial ligands, in particular, the trans ‐positioned ones, which affect the back‐bonding formation between the metal ion and dioxygen, and in consequence the activation process [94] . Electron‐donating trans axial ligands, being introduced from either the direct covalently coupling or the secondary coordination sphere at the meso ‐positions, can improve ORR activity and selectivity by facilitating oxygen binding and activation through the electronic “push effect”, by which the electrophilic attack of a proton to the metal center becomes more favored [95,96,97] . A density functional theory (DFT) study on an iron porphyrin 26 in Figure 8 bearing both acid releasing group and axial imidazole ligand suggested that the carboxylic acid group can (de)stabilize the Fe−O bonding by forming hydrogen bonds with the adsorbed reaction intermediates, while the axial ligand raised the affinity of the iron‐bound super‐oxo and per‐oxo ligands for proton as well as stabilized a key precursor for O−O bond cleavage, thus leading to remarkable 4‐electron selectivity and positive reduction potentials for the ORRs [98] .…”