2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2015.7344119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering self-efficacy, interactions with faculty, and other forms of capital for underrepresented engineering students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, there is a growing recognition of the need for STEM workers who provide diverse perspectives enabling companies to keep up with the demands of the 21 st -century workforce. Not surprisingly, creating a diverse workforce requires improving access to STEM education for historically underrepresented students, including low-income students and first-generation students (Dika, Pando, Tempest, Foxx, & Allen, 2015;MacPhee, Farro, & Canetto, 2013). Science and engineering employment statistics are dismal for historically underrepresented individuals.…”
Section: Problem Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, there is a growing recognition of the need for STEM workers who provide diverse perspectives enabling companies to keep up with the demands of the 21 st -century workforce. Not surprisingly, creating a diverse workforce requires improving access to STEM education for historically underrepresented students, including low-income students and first-generation students (Dika, Pando, Tempest, Foxx, & Allen, 2015;MacPhee, Farro, & Canetto, 2013). Science and engineering employment statistics are dismal for historically underrepresented individuals.…”
Section: Problem Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests there are a number of barriers preventing recruitment, retention, persistence, and completion in STEM (Johri & Olds, 2014), which is multiplied when considering challenges commonly experienced by historically underrepresented students in STEM (Dika et al, 2015;MacPhee et al, 2013). Student identity and beliefs have a more significant impact on predicting student choice to enroll in STEM programs than student performance and competence level (Godwin, Potvin, Hazari, & Lock, 2016).…”
Section: Barriers and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realizing the pervasiveness of whiteness in service-learning, Mitchell et al (2012) called for increasing faculty's capacity and confidence to interrupt the patterns and privileges of whiteness too often normalized in service-learning. For underrepresented minority students, enhancing their engineering self-efficacy and sense of belonging might be one of the potent strategies that might increase the number of underrepresented groups in the engineering field (Dika et al, 2015).…”
Section: Gender and Ethnicity Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Providing and promoting shared physical and virtual spaces for students to interact with faculty, build professional relationships, and more effectively seek help and/or access information [57], [58]. • Expanding the criteria and metrics for admission into engineering programs that go beyond standardized test scores (e.g., semi-structured interviews to better understand prospective students' strengths and characteristics [53]), coupled with rigorous cohort-based curricular and co-curricular activities during the first year in the program [53], [54], [55].…”
Section: Asset-based Strategies At Program-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%