Engineering resource allocation in artificially minimized cells: Is genome reduction the best strategy?

Abstract

The elimination of the expression of cellular functions that are not needed in a certain well-defined artificial environment, such as those used in industrial production facilities, has been the goal of many cellular minimization projects. The generation of a minimal cell with reduced burden and less host-function interactions has been pursued as a tool to improve microbial production strains. In this work, we analysed two cellular complexity reduction strategies: genome and proteome reduction. With the aid of an absolute proteomics data set and a genome-scale model of metabolism and protein expression (MEmodel), we quantitatively assessed the difference of reducing genome to the correspondence of reducing proteome. We compare the approaches in terms of energy consumption, defined in ATP equivalents. We aim to show what is the best strategy for improving resource allocation in minimized cells. Our results show that genome reduction by length is not proportional to reducing resource use. When we normalize calculated energy savings, we show that strains with the larger calculated proteome reduction show the largest resource use reduction. Furthermore, we propose that reducing highly expressed proteins should be the target as the translation of a gene uses most of the energy. The strategies proposed here should guide cell design when the aim of a project is to reduce the maximum amount or cellular resources.

Synergistic investigation of natural and synthetic C1-trophic microorganisms to foster a circular carbon economy

“…In this context, the utilization of more efficient synthetic assimilation pathways should lead to higher yields. Evolving or engineering enzymes with higher catalytic rates might enable the construction of strains with a lower protein burden in catabolic enzymes, capable of more efficient growth 135 . Moreover, the utilization of minimal cell factories can play a big role in preventing resources diverting into useless portions of biomass.…”

Recombinant protein expression in proteome‐reduced cells under aerobic and oxygen‐limited regimes

“…Removing proteome is more effective in terms of cellular resource savings than removing genome, because the latter focuses on decreasing or eliminating protein expression, which has a higher impact in ATP savings. For example, translation takes 96% of the energy, when compared on a per gen (950 bp) basis, whereas transcription takes 3.9% and replication just around 0.1% of the total energy (Marquez‐Zavala & Utrilla, 2023). Through a rational modification of the transcriptional regulatory network of E. coli , a strain containing only three mutations reduced 0.5% of its proteome (Lastiri‐Pancardo et al, 2020).…”

Enhancing Escherichia coli abiotic stress resistance through ornithine lipid formation

“…To improve industrial production, it is desirable to cultivate strains that can handle stress and different growth conditions (Calero and Nikel 2019 ). Such adapted microorganisms are called “microbial chassis” (Beites and Mendes 2015 ) and can be engineered using synthetic biology tools (Marquez‐Zavala and Utrilla 2023 ).…”