2021
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202101096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Pt Nanoparticles onto Resin‐Derived Iron and Nitrogen Co‐Doped Porous Carbon Nanostructure Boosts Oxygen Reduction Catalysis

Abstract: The high cost and deficiency of long-term durability of carbon supported Pt catalysts have been regarded as obstacle that impeding their practical proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) technologies. Furtherly, iron and nitrogen co-doped carbons (Fe/NC) are emerging as a steady electrocatalyst. Unfortunately, there are less-active sites in acidic electrolyte. Herein, combining the advantages of Fe/NC and Pt catalysts, we propose an in-situ surfactant-free self-templating solution reduction strategy to co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1d) that the lattice spacing of the catalyst particles was 0.2251 nm, which was assigned to the (111) crystal plane of Pt, indicating that the Pt salt precursor was efficiently transformed into Pt NPs, which agreed with XRD test results. 39 Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 1e-k, the uniform elemental distribution of C, N, Pt, and Fe and the obvious hollow framework structure revealed by mapping of Pt@Fe-NC further conrmed that ZIF-8@PDA-Fe 2+ was successfully transformed into hollow Fe-NC supports by pyrolysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1d) that the lattice spacing of the catalyst particles was 0.2251 nm, which was assigned to the (111) crystal plane of Pt, indicating that the Pt salt precursor was efficiently transformed into Pt NPs, which agreed with XRD test results. 39 Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 1e-k, the uniform elemental distribution of C, N, Pt, and Fe and the obvious hollow framework structure revealed by mapping of Pt@Fe-NC further conrmed that ZIF-8@PDA-Fe 2+ was successfully transformed into hollow Fe-NC supports by pyrolysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…metal state and oxidation state) of the metals in the catalyst. 39,44,45 Furthermore, the electrochemically active surface area of the Pt@Fe-NC catalyst was calculated to be 77.79 m 2 g À1 (Table S1 †) using the CO stripping peak area and loading of Pt, which is higher than that of commercial Pt/C (69.12 m 2 g À1 ), indicating that the Pt@Fe-NC sample can be expected to have high ORR activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, according to oxygen reduction reaction polarization curves of PtCo@NC‐X (Figure 5b), the PtCo@NC‐60 displays a larger half‐wave potential (0.947 V) relative to PtCo@NC‐80 (0.930 V), PtCo@NC‐40 (0.920 V) and commercial Pt/C (0.896 V) catalysts, preliminarily implying that the as‐prepared PtCo@NC‐60 catalyst possesses enhanced electrocatalytic activity. To insight into their ORR activity more deeply, the mass activities (MA) and the specific activity (SA) are calculated by normalizing the current density and Pt loading on the electrode [28] . As depicted in Figure 5c, the MA in the PtCo@NC‐60 catalyst (1.36 mA ⋅ mg −1 Pt ) is 1.68, 2.10 and 6.18 times larger than that of PtCo@NC‐80 (0.81 mA ⋅ mg −1 Pt ), PtCo@NC‐40 (0.65 mA ⋅ mg −1 Pt ) and initial Pt/C (0.22 mA⋅mg −1 Pt ) catalysts, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To insight into their ORR activity more deeply, the mass activities (MA) and the specific activity (SA) are calculated by normalizing the current density and Pt loading on the electrode. [28] As depicted in Figure 5c, the MA in the PtCo@NC-60 catalyst (1.36 mA • mg À 1 Pt ) is 1.68, 2.10 and 6.18 times larger than that of PtCo@NC-80 (0.81 mA • mg À 1 Pt ), PtCo@NC-40 (0.65 mA • mg À 1 Pt ) and initial Pt/C (0.22 mA•mg À 1 Pt ) catalysts, respectively. Meanwhile, the SA of PtCo@NC-60 catalyst (1.98 mA • cm À 2 ) is 1.65, 2.00 and 6.39 times than those of PtCo@NC-80 (1.20 mA • cm À 2 ), PtCo@NC-40 (0.99 mA • cm À 2 ) and commercial Pt/C (0.31 mA • cm À 2 ), respectively (Figure 5d).…”
Section: Chemelectrochemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these materials can also serve as supports for dispersing and anchoring catalyst particles, offering additional benefits. In particular, metal–nitrogen-doped carbon materials (M–N–C), such as Fe–N–C and Ni–N–C, are chosen to combine with Pt nanoparticles for offsetting the drawbacks of both components and further improving the catalytic performance via metal–support interaction. The M–N x sites are believed to act as the hub for the nucleation and growth of Pt nanoparticles . This not only allows the Pt nanoparticle to be anchored and stabilized but also induces charge redistribution between the support and Pt, thereby facilitating the catalytic activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%