2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70333-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering principles applied to implantable otologic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows current model predicted stapes displacements for different types of the electromagnetic transducers. The result shows that, when the transducer attached to the incus long process (i.e., for FMT), the force required to stimulate the vibration of ossicles to the equivalent of 100 dB SPL is about 89 N. This result is consistent with Ko et al 's former report [31]. For EDT, that is, the transducer attached to the umbo, the required driving force decreased to 60 N. On the contrary, when the transducer attached to the incus body (i.e., for IBDT), the required driving force for the transducer increased to 200 N. Therefore, compensating a similar level of hearing loss, the IBDT requires the biggest driving force, while EDT requires the smallest one.…”
Section: Effects Of the Transducer Type On The Mei Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Figure 6 shows current model predicted stapes displacements for different types of the electromagnetic transducers. The result shows that, when the transducer attached to the incus long process (i.e., for FMT), the force required to stimulate the vibration of ossicles to the equivalent of 100 dB SPL is about 89 N. This result is consistent with Ko et al 's former report [31]. For EDT, that is, the transducer attached to the umbo, the required driving force decreased to 60 N. On the contrary, when the transducer attached to the incus body (i.e., for IBDT), the required driving force for the transducer increased to 200 N. Therefore, compensating a similar level of hearing loss, the IBDT requires the biggest driving force, while EDT requires the smallest one.…”
Section: Effects Of the Transducer Type On The Mei Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The geometry of a transducer affects frequency-response characteristics. Mechanically, the length and mass of a transducer determine its resonance frequency in such way that a short transducer would have a higher resonance frequency than a longer transducer of similar mass [13][14][15] . Conversely, the longer the transducer for a given mass, the more force it generates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the vibrator that is implanted in an incus in the middle ear cavity is designed to consider the amplified displacement of the sound pressure. The stapes displacement of 100 nm is enough for the transducer to be used in current IMEHDs [7] and the frequency response characteristics of the incus are similar to that of the stapes [3]. From the Eq.…”
Section: Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the electromagnetic vibrators that have been developed for IMEHDs [7][8][9][10][11], the Vibrant Soundbridge (MED-EL Corporation) is the only device obtained the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. The floating mass transducer (FMT) of their IMEHDs is an electromagnetic transducer attached with a titanium clamp to the incus long process through a facial recess approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%