2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11705-018-1740-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering operando methodology: Understanding catalysis in time and space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porous frameworks seem to be the ideal model materials for such a development due to their modular character and multivariate construction principles 51,52 . These developments may significantly profit from advanced techniques and understanding of spatiotemporal phenomena in catalysis [72][73][74] .…”
Section: Current Understanding Of Dynamic Phenomena In Metalorganic Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous frameworks seem to be the ideal model materials for such a development due to their modular character and multivariate construction principles 51,52 . These developments may significantly profit from advanced techniques and understanding of spatiotemporal phenomena in catalysis [72][73][74] .…”
Section: Current Understanding Of Dynamic Phenomena In Metalorganic Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, catalyst characterization needs to be conducted operando, meaning relevant reaction conditions for a robust correlation between catalytic activity and catalyst structure. [26][27][28] In this regard, X-ray based methods like X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) are attractive. Here, we use the more sophisticated photon-in/-out-technique high energy resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption near edge structure (HERFD-XANES), [29][30][31] which is especially powerful, since it employs highly penetrating X-rays and it provides indepth information on the noble metal atomic and electronic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the catalyst activity is measured after the entire catalyst bed and thus integrated over all of the catalyst material in the system, irrespective of its specific local state, which may vary significantly across the bed due to temperature and reactant concentration gradients. Consequently, this combination of integral activity measurements with single point probing of catalyst material state is prone to produce erroneous structure-function relationships 9,10 . In attempts to alleviate this problem, recent studies have used a combination of techniques to both spatially and temporally investigate model 3,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and more complex catalysts 9,11,12,[18][19][20][21][22] , with several comprehensive reviews on the topic published recently 2,9,10,23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%