2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2010.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering of Open Learning Scenarios - The Case of Hop3x Learning Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that when ICT tools are not flexible and cannot be adapted by teachers, there is little chance for them to be adopted (Ouraiba et al, 2010). As explained below, a small study we conducted with teachers shows that this is also the case for SGs.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been shown that when ICT tools are not flexible and cannot be adapted by teachers, there is little chance for them to be adopted (Ouraiba et al, 2010). As explained below, a small study we conducted with teachers shows that this is also the case for SGs.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We consider that a pedagogical scenario, for being really designed and manipulated by a teacher, has to be considered as a domain specific model, expressed with a DSEML (Domain-Specific Educational Modeling Language) situated in his/her teaching context and rooted in his/her practices. In such a paradigm, MDE techniques have to support the transformation of the scenario from domain specific representation to operationalized one, both at the design phase to support the operationalization and at runtime to support the dynamic adaptation (Ouraiba et al, 2010).…”
Section: Dsm / Mde For Supporting Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work falls under this last approach. By the use of Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM) and Model-driven Engineering (MDE) paradigm we want to surpass the difficulties a teacher can encounter when using generic EMLs and existing editors (Ouraiba et al, 2010). This, by defining the Domain-Specific Language (DSL) of teacher and developing accordingly a dedicated editor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%