Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In multi-stage plug-and-perf horizontal well completions, there are a multitude of moving parts and variables to consider when evaluating performance drivers. Properly identifying performance drivers allows an operator to focus their efforts to maximize the rate of return of resource development. Typically, well-to-well comparisons are made to help identify performance drivers, but in many cases the differences are not clear. Identifying these drivers may require a better understanding of performance variability along a single lateral. Data analytics can help to identify performance drivers using existing data from development activities. In the case study below, multiple diagnostics are utilized to identify performance drivers. A combination of completion diagnostics including oil and water tracers, stimulation data, reservoir data, 3D seismic, and borehole image logs were collected on a set of wells in the early appraisal phase of a field. Using oil tracers as the best indication of stage level performance along the laterals, data analytics is applied to uncover the relationships between the tracers and the numerous diagnostics. After smoothing was applied to the dataset, trends between oil tracer recovery, several independent variables and features seen in image logs and 3D seismic were identified. All the analyses pointed to decreasing tracer recovery, and likely decreased oil production, near faulted areas along each lateral. A random forest model showed a moderate prediction power, where the model's predicted tracer recovery on blind stages was able to explain 54% of the variance seen in the tracer response (r2=0.54). This analysis suggests the identification of certain faulted areas along the wellbore could lead to ways of improving individual well economics by adjusting completion design in these areas.
In multi-stage plug-and-perf horizontal well completions, there are a multitude of moving parts and variables to consider when evaluating performance drivers. Properly identifying performance drivers allows an operator to focus their efforts to maximize the rate of return of resource development. Typically, well-to-well comparisons are made to help identify performance drivers, but in many cases the differences are not clear. Identifying these drivers may require a better understanding of performance variability along a single lateral. Data analytics can help to identify performance drivers using existing data from development activities. In the case study below, multiple diagnostics are utilized to identify performance drivers. A combination of completion diagnostics including oil and water tracers, stimulation data, reservoir data, 3D seismic, and borehole image logs were collected on a set of wells in the early appraisal phase of a field. Using oil tracers as the best indication of stage level performance along the laterals, data analytics is applied to uncover the relationships between the tracers and the numerous diagnostics. After smoothing was applied to the dataset, trends between oil tracer recovery, several independent variables and features seen in image logs and 3D seismic were identified. All the analyses pointed to decreasing tracer recovery, and likely decreased oil production, near faulted areas along each lateral. A random forest model showed a moderate prediction power, where the model's predicted tracer recovery on blind stages was able to explain 54% of the variance seen in the tracer response (r2=0.54). This analysis suggests the identification of certain faulted areas along the wellbore could lead to ways of improving individual well economics by adjusting completion design in these areas.
The application of data science remains relatively new to the oil and gas industry but continues to gain traction on many projects due to its potential to assist in solving complex problems. The amount and quality of the right type of data can be as much of a limitation as the complex algorithms and programing required. The scope of any data science project should look for easy wins early on and not attempt an all-encompassing solution with the click of a button (although that would be amazing). This paper focuses on several specific applications of data applied to a sizable database to extract useful solutions and provide an approach for data science on future projects. The first step when applying data analytics is to build a suitable database. This might appear rudimentary at first glance, but historical data is seldom catalogued optimally for future projects. This is especially true if specific portions of the recorded data were not known to be of use in solving future problems. The approach to improving the quality of the database for this paper is to establish requirements for the data science objectives and apply this to past, present and future data. Once the data are in the right "format", the extensive process of quality control can begin. Although this part of the paper is not the most exciting, it might be the most important, as most programing yields the same "garbage in = garbage out" equation. After the data have found a home and are quality checked, the data science can be applied. Case studies are presented based on the application of diagnostic data from an extensive project/well database. To leverage historical data in new projects, metrics are created as a benchmarking tool. The case studies in this paper include metrics such as the Known Lateral Contribution (KLC), Heel-to-Toe Ratio (HTR), Communication Intensity (CI), Proppant Efficiency (PE) and stage level performance. These results are compared to additional stimulation and geological information. This paper includes case studies that apply data science to diagnostics on a large scale to deliver actionable results. The results discussed will allow for the utilization of this approach in future projects and provide a roadmap to better understand diagnostic results as they relate to drilling and completion activity.
Fracture-driven interactions (FDI’s) occur on most modern drilling and completion programs. These well-to-well interactions can be of benefit, but it is often difficult to quantify the lasting effects of these interactions and benchmark it for comparison. The approach for quantifying the effects of fracture-driven interactions in this paper is to compare the magnitude and duration of communication events identified by chemical tracers for wells in a specific basin. Metrics are established to compare communication between projects to determine the effects of "common contributors" to significant fracture-driven interactions. The common contributors compared in this paper are well spacing, depletion effects from prior production, perforation cluster design, geologic features, and stimulation treatment design. A "Communication Intensity" metric (CI) is established to quantify the amount of communication taking place on a particular pad or project. This is computed for hundreds of projects across a basin or multiple basins. The CI is used as a performance indicator to compare current project-level communication to area or basin-level benchmarks. Case histories are presented in this paper that utilize the CI metric to determine the effects of common contributors of well communication to established basin benchmarks. In addition to project-level communication, localized (well-level) communication events are investigated to determine the cause of the individual event and if any preventative or mitigative strategy could have been applied in the job design or execution phase. Few if any industry benchmarks are available to compare the immediate, intermittent, and lasting effects of fracture-driven interactions (FDI’s) on a project or well level. The results of this paper outline a process for comparing projects to optimize well spacing and fracturing treatment design, as well as reflect on known and unknown features contributing to significant interactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.