2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-012-9199-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering design applications of surrogate-assisted optimization techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, N Q, were randomly generated to be uniformly distributed over the feasible sets. Also the latin hypercube design of experiments (Sóbester et al 2014) was tested to generate the sample points, but since the resulting improvements of the success of approximation of an optimal solution-as compared with randomly generated sample points-was negligible we chose to use sample points with randomly generated coordinates over their respective feasible intervals (using Matlab's pseudo-random number generator). Considering the various measures for comparing algorithms discussed in this section, the following experimental procedure, inspired by Montaz Ali et al (2005), was established.…”
Section: Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, N Q, were randomly generated to be uniformly distributed over the feasible sets. Also the latin hypercube design of experiments (Sóbester et al 2014) was tested to generate the sample points, but since the resulting improvements of the success of approximation of an optimal solution-as compared with randomly generated sample points-was negligible we chose to use sample points with randomly generated coordinates over their respective feasible intervals (using Matlab's pseudo-random number generator). Considering the various measures for comparing algorithms discussed in this section, the following experimental procedure, inspired by Montaz Ali et al (2005), was established.…”
Section: Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of surrogate models and optimization is a powerful tool when concepts of complex products are to be evaluated using modelling and simulation [11]. The most widely used method that involves surrogate models in the industry today is probably to create a surrogate model of a computationally demanding model and then perform an optimization on the surrogate model.…”
Section: Surrogate Model Assisted Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sóbester et al [11] go as far as to claim that surrogate-based optimization is one of the most significant advances in engineering design technology. This emphases the importance of and the possibilities that the combination of surrogate models and optimization opens up for development of complex products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the surrogate model is built from design points (input-output data points) calculated from the VPSA simulator . Kriging based algorithms have been widely used for single-objective optimisation but there are other issues involved in the multi-objective setting (Sóbester et al, 2014;Voutchkov & Keane, 2010). We propose a novel transformation of the purity and recovery outputs in the surrogate model training 45 phase, as well as a procedure for dealing with the possible failure in the simulator runs during the search.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kriging regression (Jin et al, 2001;Sóbester et al, 2014;Stein, 1999) is a popular surrogate modelling technique for engineering design and is used in this work. Other popular techniques include polynomial response surfaces, radial basis functions (RBF), artificial neural networks (ANN), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and support vector regression (SVR) (Forrester & Keane, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%