1956
DOI: 10.1021/ie50558a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ENGINEERING, DESIGN, AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT Electrorefining for Removing Fission Products from Uranium Fuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…110 The CV results suggest that UO 2 2+ goes through the two-step reduction process to UO 2 shown in Eqs. 15 Peaks C 2 and C 3 were not attributed to U redox chemistry. Rather, they arise as a result of impurities in the melt due to some corrosion of the platinum containment vessel.…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…110 The CV results suggest that UO 2 2+ goes through the two-step reduction process to UO 2 shown in Eqs. 15 Peaks C 2 and C 3 were not attributed to U redox chemistry. Rather, they arise as a result of impurities in the melt due to some corrosion of the platinum containment vessel.…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To further support the claims made in the LiCl-KCl Eutectic (chloride system) section, 6,46 Figs. 15 and 16 show that the direct oxidation of U metal to U(IV) (Eq. 11) was preferred over the U metal to U(III) oxidation (Eq.…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation