2020
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201908357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Co2MnAlxSi1−x Heusler Compounds as a Model System to Correlate Spin Polarization, Intrinsic Gilbert Damping, and Ultrafast Demagnetization

Abstract: Engineering of magnetic materials for developing better spintronic applications relies on the control of two key parameters: the spin polarization and the Gilbert damping, responsible for the spin angular momentum dissipation. Both of them are expected to affect the ultrafast magnetization dynamics occurring on the femtosecond timescale. Here, engineered Co2MnAlxSi1‐x Heusler compounds are used to adjust the degree of spin polarization at the Fermi energy, P, from 60% to 100% and to investigate how they correl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16,17] Note that the demagnetization time (𝜏 M ) has been found to be related to the degree of spin polarization (P) by 𝜏 M ∝ (1 − P) −1 . [16,18] However, as opposed to CrO 2 , Fe 3 O 4 , and LaSrMnO 3 , the laser-induced demagnetizations of Co-based Heusler alloys Co 2 MnSi (𝜏 M ≈ 0.34 − 0.38 ps), Co 2 MnAl (𝜏 M ≈ 0.16 ps), Co 2 FeSi (𝜏 M ≈ 0.25 − 0.28 ps), and Co 2 FeAl (𝜏 M ≈ 0.2 ps) are much faster. [19][20][21][22] These ultrafast demagnetization time scales are similar with that of elemental 3d ferromagnets, such as Co (≈0.1 ps), Fe (≈0.10-0.30 ps), and Ni (≈0.60-0.80 ps).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,17] Note that the demagnetization time (𝜏 M ) has been found to be related to the degree of spin polarization (P) by 𝜏 M ∝ (1 − P) −1 . [16,18] However, as opposed to CrO 2 , Fe 3 O 4 , and LaSrMnO 3 , the laser-induced demagnetizations of Co-based Heusler alloys Co 2 MnSi (𝜏 M ≈ 0.34 − 0.38 ps), Co 2 MnAl (𝜏 M ≈ 0.16 ps), Co 2 FeSi (𝜏 M ≈ 0.25 − 0.28 ps), and Co 2 FeAl (𝜏 M ≈ 0.2 ps) are much faster. [19][20][21][22] These ultrafast demagnetization time scales are similar with that of elemental 3d ferromagnets, such as Co (≈0.1 ps), Fe (≈0.10-0.30 ps), and Ni (≈0.60-0.80 ps).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] They have established an inverse relationship between fast remagnetization time (𝜏 r ) and 𝛼 due to the dominant contribution of magnon dynamics to the remagnetization process. Despite some efforts, [16][17][18]25,29,31,32] a systematic study on various effects of SOC of NM materials on the ultrafast demagnetization and fast remagnetization in NM/FM heterostructures has not been performed so far. In particular, the relationship among the 𝜏 m , 𝜏 r , and 𝛼 with the SOC strength of NM in NM/FM heterostructures has never been experimentally demonstrated or theoretically formulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also presents a high saturation magnetization (1.26 T) 12,13 which allows operating with frequencies above the GHz range at remanence and could result in larger frequency band gaps in MC 14,15 . It also presents a high spin polarization (above 90% experimentally) [16][17][18][19][20][21] allowing interesting magnon spintronic devices [22][23][24] . However, to our knowledge, only few magnonics studies 10,11,[25][26][27][28] have been performed up to now with such materials and few Co-based Heusler alloy magnonic crystals exist in the literature 29,30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%