Engineering assessment of low-level liquid waste disposal caisson locations at the 618-11 Burial Grounds

Abstract

LEGALDISCLAIMER Thisreportwas preparedas 3n accountof worksponsored by an agencyof the UnitedStatesGovernment.Neitharthe UnitedStatesGovernment norany agencythereof,nor anyof theiremployees, norany of theircontractors, subcontractors or theiremployees, makesanywarranty,expressor implied, or assumesany legalliabilityor responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or anythirdparty'suseor the results of suchuseof any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that itsuse wouldnotinfringe privatelyownedrights. Referencehereinto anyspecific commercial product, process, or serviceby tradename, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, doesnotnecessarily constitute or implyits endorsement, recommendation, or favoringbythe UnitedStates Government or anyagency thereofor its contractors or subcontractors. Theviewsand opinions of authorsexpressed hereindo not necessarily state or reflectthoseof the UnitedStatesGovernment or any agencythereof. Thisreporthasbeenreproduced fromthe bestavailablecopy. Availablein papercopyandmicrofiche.

Characterization of 618-11 solid waste burial ground, disposed waste, and description of the waste generating facilities

“…(3) the enlarged photograph ( Figure 2-14), which clearly shows the two most westerly caisson waste pipe openings at a substantially smaller diameter than the adjacent three foot caisson opening; and (4) the EM1 done, (Phillips 1982Bergstrom 1997 clearly shows three anomalies to the west of the drum storage units at W2,906.67 to W2,.…”

“…The EM1 of the site done in 1982 depicts three scattered drum storage unit images in the north row, one missing drum storage unit in the center row, and denotes another caisson at the westem end of the center row (Phillips 1982). These discrepancies can be voided by enlargements of site photographs (Figures 2-7 and 2-14) and the EMUGPR done in 1994 (Bergstrom 1997).…”