1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1976.tb01380.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Assessment and Critique of Instruments Used for Meat Tenderness Evaluation*

Abstract: A review of the methods used to measure meat texture indicates considerable confusion in terminology, test conditions, and interpretation of the readings that makes evaluation of the results a complex task. Standardization of the methods appears premature and until this is accomplished, the applied methodology must be reported fully. Errors due to instrument design can no longer be accepted since modern instruments that overcome this are readily available. A common error in terminology or interpretation is the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
1
3

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
45
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Embora a FoCi esteja padronizada para bovinos, diversos pesquisadores têm realizado adaptações da técnica, principalmente na etapa do cozimento, para determinação das características da carne no mús-culo LL de ovinos (Voisey, 1976;Honikel, 1998). Assim, Hoffman et al (2003), utilizando a mesma técnica adotada nesta pesquisa, constataram efeito para o genótipo, mas com grande variação entre as raças (6,7 a 10,7 kgf) …”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Embora a FoCi esteja padronizada para bovinos, diversos pesquisadores têm realizado adaptações da técnica, principalmente na etapa do cozimento, para determinação das características da carne no mús-culo LL de ovinos (Voisey, 1976;Honikel, 1998). Assim, Hoffman et al (2003), utilizando a mesma técnica adotada nesta pesquisa, constataram efeito para o genótipo, mas com grande variação entre as raças (6,7 a 10,7 kgf) …”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…To determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) values, five 12.7 mm diameter cores were cut perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the muscle fibres at a crosshead speed of 299 mm/min (Voisey, 1976) from the same samples used to determine cooking loss. The mean for the WBS-values of the five cores was calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weights of the cooked samples were determined after decanting the liquid phase, and the cooking loss calculated as total fluid lost, expressed as a percentage of the fresh (uncooked) sample. Five 1.27 cm diameter samples (from the centre of each M. longissimus thoracis sample) were removed at random for determining Warner-Bratzler shear force values (Voisey, 1976). The samples were cut parallel to the muscle fibre direction in order to measure the influence of the myofibrillar proteins on shear force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%