2023
DOI: 10.1109/rbme.2022.3181700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Approaches for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frozen section examination, used during intra-operative margin assessment, takes about 20 min per sample but is skill-intensive and subjective, requiring a high level of expertise from the pathologist, who also uses a high suspicion index to arrive at the conclusions [43]. While several technologies have been developed for non-invasive diagnostic breast imaging for identifying cancerous lesions and for intra-operative margin identification from large-sized excised ex vivo samples during surgical resection, advancements toward improving the analysis and diagnosis of ex vivo tissues extracted during biopsy (such as samples from core needle (CNB) and incisional biopsy) have been limited [44,45]. Most of the technologies available for diagnosing breast cancer from ex vivo tissues are compatible with analyzing only the largersized samples greater than 1 cm owing to the size of the equipment, the form factor of the probe, spatial resolution limitation, and power constraints [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frozen section examination, used during intra-operative margin assessment, takes about 20 min per sample but is skill-intensive and subjective, requiring a high level of expertise from the pathologist, who also uses a high suspicion index to arrive at the conclusions [43]. While several technologies have been developed for non-invasive diagnostic breast imaging for identifying cancerous lesions and for intra-operative margin identification from large-sized excised ex vivo samples during surgical resection, advancements toward improving the analysis and diagnosis of ex vivo tissues extracted during biopsy (such as samples from core needle (CNB) and incisional biopsy) have been limited [44,45]. Most of the technologies available for diagnosing breast cancer from ex vivo tissues are compatible with analyzing only the largersized samples greater than 1 cm owing to the size of the equipment, the form factor of the probe, spatial resolution limitation, and power constraints [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer in women has surpassed lung cancer as the most common cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%) ( 1 ). Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with multiple subtypes, each of which (Luminal type, HER2 + type, triple-negative breast cancer) all have unique clinical, pathological, and molecular features ( 2 , 3 ). HER2 is an epidermal growth factor receptor that is highly expressed in 20% of breast cancers ( 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goh et al [6] used a multispectral optoacoustic tomography system to quantify the breast cancer margin assessment. The photoacoustic system has also been used to differentiate the malignant tissue from the normal tissues by quantifying the melanin, oxygenated and deoxygenated haemoglobin [7]- [10]. Low-cost alternatives to photoacoustic imaging are gaining relevance in the scientific field, especially after the advent of low narrow-band and short-bandwidth LEDs [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%