1993
DOI: 10.2514/3.11322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering approach to the prediction of shock patterns in bounded high-speed flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evolution of the Mach stem height in a frozen flow is compared with the existing analytical 1D models of Azevedo and Liu (1993) and Li and Ben-Dor (1997), as also shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This evolution of the Mach stem height in a frozen flow is compared with the existing analytical 1D models of Azevedo and Liu (1993) and Li and Ben-Dor (1997), as also shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same wedge angle and when the MR wave configuration exists, this length is smaller when the nonequilibrium flow assumption is included in the air-flow modeling. A comparison of the analytical predictions of Azevedo and Liu (1993) and Li and Ben-Dor (1997), indicates the extent of the oversimplifying assumptions used by Azevedo and Liu regarding the location of the throat in the quasi one-dimensional converging nozzle behind the Mach stem. This oversimplification was less pronounced when the heights of the Mach stem were calculated (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analogous supposition is accepted in the analysis of flow in the plane narrowing channel between two wedges (Fig. 1b) [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They pointed out that Mach stems can be expressed in the general form as a function of specific heat capacity ratio, incoming flow Mach number, reflecting wedge angle, and exit cross-sectional area given trailing edge and wedge length. A physical model for predicting the height of 2D Mach stems was suggested by Azevedo and Liu (1993) [10]. However, Li and Ben-Dor [11] raised some doubts about Azevedo's model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning, a Mach stem was considered a shock wave of small curvature or a normal wave because there was not good understanding of its shape [10]. A study by Dewey and McMillin [12] conducted a series of experiments on the shape of Mach stems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%