2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering antigen-specific immunological tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, prior studies utilizing IFN‐α/β injections to increase antibody responses have reported that IFN‐α/β–mediated responses by cDCs, T cells, and B cells promoted humoral immune responses to soluble antigens . This apparent discrepancy might reflect inherent differences between responses to soluble and RBC‐bound antigens . In addition, although RBC alloimmunization to other antigens requires DC presentation to T cells, it is possible that T cell help is not required for anti‐KEL responses in this model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, prior studies utilizing IFN‐α/β injections to increase antibody responses have reported that IFN‐α/β–mediated responses by cDCs, T cells, and B cells promoted humoral immune responses to soluble antigens . This apparent discrepancy might reflect inherent differences between responses to soluble and RBC‐bound antigens . In addition, although RBC alloimmunization to other antigens requires DC presentation to T cells, it is possible that T cell help is not required for anti‐KEL responses in this model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The role of IFN‐α/β in RBC alloimmunization has not been previously investigated. In comparison to viral and soluble antigens, RBC‐bound antigens differ in their route of administration, quantity of antigen, duration of exposure, and accessibility to niches within secondary lymphoid tissue . Thus, the role of IFN‐α/β in RBC alloimmunization may differ from their role in autoimmunity, viral infections, or immunization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] When tolerance to self-antigens (e.g. host proteins) is not maintained, inflammation and autoimmune disease can develop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11–19] These populations can control self-reactive effector cells (e.g., T H 1, T H 17) that drive autoimmune disease while limiting broad suppression. [1] Expansion and biasing of T cells toward regulatory response also reduces the absolute number of inflammatory cells and offers the potential for more durable treatments. [20, 21]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,10,11] Thus a variety of different approaches have been pursued to mitigate immunogenicity, including shielding proteins with chemical or biological blocking moieties (e.g., PEGylation,[12,13] XTENylation,[14] PASylation,[15] or reductive methylation[16]), explicitly training the immune system to tolerate proteins,[17] or implicitly rendering proteins tolerable by humanization (with emerging new engineering techniques for antibodies[18-22] as well as non-immunoglobulin proteins[23,24]). In any case, molecular recognition of exogenous proteins by antibodies, antigen presenting cells, and T cells is central to the anti-biotherapeutic immune response, and this review focuses on protein deimmunization by genetic manipulation of immunogenic subsequences, termed “epitopes”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%