Engineering and Employing Reusable Software Components for Modular Verification

Welch, Daniel; Sitaraman, Murali

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56856-0_10

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, implementations must provide the correspondence information (abstraction functions or relations) necessary to connect the concrete state (in the implementation) to the abstract state (in the interface). Readers interested in a more complete description of RESOLVE should consult [11,13,28,29] or one of the case studies [22,30,34] carried out using the language.…”

Section: Abstract Specificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

F-IDEs with Features and VCs Designed to Assist Human Reasoning When Verification Fails

Sun

Welch

Sitaraman

2021

Electron. Proc. Theor. Comput. Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper summarizes our efforts to aid human reasoning when verification fails through the use of two distinct Formalization Integrated Development Environments (F-IDEs) that we have developed. Both environments are modular and facilitate reasoning about the full behavior of object-based code. The first environment, referred to as the web-IDE, has been used for several years to teach aspects of formal specification and verification, including why and where verification conditions (VCs) arise and how to use them when verification fails. The second F-IDE, RESOLVE Studio, remains experimental, but is a more fully-fledged environment backed by a sequent-based VC generator that produces VCs with fewer extraneous givens. While the environments and VC generation techniques are necessarily language specific, the principles of alternative VC generation methods, F-IDE features, and observations about their impact on novices and experienced users are more generally applicable.1 https://resolve.cs.clemson.edu/teaching 2 https://www.jetbrains.com/

show abstract

Section: Abstract Specificationmentioning

confidence: 99%