1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part III—Clinical considerations of penile hemodynamic and rigidity erectile responses

Abstract: Purpose: The extent to which hemodynamic erectile responses predict penile buckling forces has not previously been analytically investigated. An engineering study was performed to compare hemodynamic data with penile buckling force values. Methods: Dynamic infusion pharmacocavernosometry studies in 21 impotent patients (age 43, range 24±62 y) were accomplished to obtain information during penile erection concerning hemodynamic values, penile buckling forces and their determinants: intracavernosal pressure, ere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact also explains the relatively low percentage of patients who received a supplementary dose of vasoactive solution in order to achieve complete smooth muscle relaxation and/or bedroom quality erectile response. The wide range of circumference and length values observed in our study sample together with the wide equilibrium intracavernosal pressure values distribution (48–92 mm Hg) reflect the important role of the geometry of the penis and the mechanical properties of the tissues in the development of a rigid erectile response [14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This fact also explains the relatively low percentage of patients who received a supplementary dose of vasoactive solution in order to achieve complete smooth muscle relaxation and/or bedroom quality erectile response. The wide range of circumference and length values observed in our study sample together with the wide equilibrium intracavernosal pressure values distribution (48–92 mm Hg) reflect the important role of the geometry of the penis and the mechanical properties of the tissues in the development of a rigid erectile response [14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently available sophisticated screening procedures, such as pharmacocavernosometry and duplex ultrasonography, offer valuable information on the hemodynamic integrity, but hemodynamic parameters are inadequate to differentiate normal from functional erectile capabilities. Intracavernosal pressure per se cannot be used as a parameter expressing penile rigidity, as its magnitude associated with rigidity varies widely and several other contributory factors have been recognized, such as the mechanical properties of the corporal tissue and the tunica albuginea, as well as penile geometry [14]. Objective assessment of the quality of erectile response during pharmacocavernosometry and determination of the lowest intracavernosal pressure associated with rigidity seems critical in the characterization of a patient as impotent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This condition can be identi®ed only through DICC with associated penile rigidometry; such conditions when recognized can be surgically cured, whereas if unrecognized can lead to an erroneous labelling of`psychogenic dysfunction'. 1,2 In our view, DICC is the gold-standard dynamic evaluation, when penile surgery is planned. For what concerns the`time-consuming' aspect of DICC, the present study provides a new methodology (VG-AVSS) that signi®cantly reduces the test time, by drastically decreasing the need of redosing'.…”
Section: Avss By Means Of Virtual Glasses (Vg-avss) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Only a few mathematical models were developed and used to study the erection process. In a three-part paper, [13][14][15] tissue properties and mechanics of penile erection were studied using an engineering approach. Mathematical models were developed to study tunica distensibility and cavernosal expandability as well as the effects of forces and pressures on buckling force of the erect penis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%