2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9cy02444a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering an alcohol dehydrogenase with enhanced activity and stereoselectivity toward diaryl ketones: reduction of steric hindrance and change of the stereocontrol element

Abstract: Engineering an alcohol dehydrogenase with enhanced activity and stereoselectivity toward diaryl ketones: reduction of steric hindrance and change of the stereocontrol element.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 f). This result was similar to that of other studies [ 25 , 32 ]. Subsequently, the kinetic parameters of Bb PheDH and obtained mutants with superior activity toward NADH were assessed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 f). This result was similar to that of other studies [ 25 , 32 ]. Subsequently, the kinetic parameters of Bb PheDH and obtained mutants with superior activity toward NADH were assessed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Directed evolution techniques are powerful tools for generating prolific sources of biocatalysts [ 22 , 23 ]. Steric hindrance of the substrate-binding pocket plays a significant role in modulating the catalytic properties of an enzyme, including enantioselectivities [ 24 , 25 ], substrate specificities [ 26 28 ], and catalytic activities [ 25 , 28 30 ]. Recent enzyme engineering studies focused on increasing or conferring enzyme activity towards non-native bulky substrates by attenuating the steric hindrance of the substrate-binding pocket.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,25 Similarly, a recent study on LkADH emphasized the importance of halogen bonds formed between halogensubstituted ketones and the enzyme. 34 For ADHs, it is generally accepted that stereoselectivity is decided by the direction of nucleophilic attack from the hydride of the C4 of NAD(P)H. 74 In summary, the difference in the formation efficiency between two alcohol enantiomers essentially represents the stereoselectivity of an ADH and the larger the difference, the higher the stereoselectivity. Consequently, catalytic stereoselectivity is closely related to enzyme− substrate interactions at the molecular level.…”
Section: General Catalytic Mechanism Of Sdr and Mdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na SDR from Novosphingobium aromaticivorans exhibited low activity toward bulky ketone substrates, whereas the variant G141A/I195L showed high stereoselectivity toward several diaryl ketones, especially (4-chlorophenyl)­(phenyl)­methanone ( 11 , ee > 93%, S ), (3-chlorophenyl)­(phenyl)­methanone ( 10 , ee > 99%, S ), and (4-chlorophenyl)­(pyridin-2-yl) methanone ( 31 , ee > 97%, R ) . Similarly, several ADHs such as TbS ADH, , Eb SDR8, and Lk ADH could not accept diaryl methanones as substrates, whereas the TbS ADH A85G/I86L , Eb SDR8 G94Q/H145F/Y188A , and Lk ADH Y190P/I144V/L199V/E145C/M206F variants could catalyze the carbonyl reduction efficiently …”
Section: Sources and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steric hindrance of the substrate-binding pocket plays a signi cant role in modulating the catalytic properties of an enzyme, including enantioselectivities [24,25], substrate speci cities [26,27], and catalytic activities [25,28,29]. Recent enzyme engineering studies focused on increasing or conferring enzyme activity towards non-native bulky substrates by attenuating the steric hindrance of the substratebinding pocket [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%