2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering allosteric communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that protein–DNA interaction design rules could not be established based on the broader study from Milk et al , a quantitative explanation for the observed increases in the dynamic ranges were difficult to reconcile completely. We posited that improved pairing of allosteric networks with alternate DNA binding domains could account for much of the improved performance, consistent with the arguments we posed previously. , To reconcile an improvement in dynamic range would require a complete assessment of the permissive allosteric network, which is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Given that protein–DNA interaction design rules could not be established based on the broader study from Milk et al , a quantitative explanation for the observed increases in the dynamic ranges were difficult to reconcile completely. We posited that improved pairing of allosteric networks with alternate DNA binding domains could account for much of the improved performance, consistent with the arguments we posed previously. , To reconcile an improvement in dynamic range would require a complete assessment of the permissive allosteric network, which is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The mechanisms by which this is achieved vary vastly, ranging from rigid body intramolecular rearrangements to global (re-) structuring events 1 . Major efforts have been directed into understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms and devising approaches for engineering of artificial allosteric protein receptors 2 . Such receptors have numerous applications as diagnostic protein biosensors, signaling surface receptors, and ligand-regulated transcription factors controlling cell metabolism 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, most progress in understanding and engineering allostery has been made with systems that can be tested using high throughput assays (transcription factors, antibiotic resistance, and fluorescent proteins). Efforts to engineer allosteric systems broadly fall into two categories: (a) protein designs where new or re-designed allosteric sites are coupled to the active sites through long range intradomain interactions 2 , and (b) utilization of ligand-binding domains that pass their conformational changes onto reporter domains thereby controlling their activity 4 . The latter approach is more straightforward but requires ligand-binding domains that undergo large conformational changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allosteric TFs serve as simple genetic switches, whereby gene expression is modulated in response to environmental, cellular, and temporal signals ( 20 , 21 ). Here, environmental signals (or INPUTS) interact with a TF’s regulatory core domain (RCD), causing an allosteric shift in the protein’s conformation to either increase or decrease the affinity of the TF’s DNA-binding domain (DBD) for specific operator DNA sequences ( 21 23 ). Operators, DNA sequences specific to the DBD, are in proximity to gene promoters, thus allowing TFs to either inhibit transcription by compromising RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding (repressor) or facilitate transcription by recruiting RNAP (activator).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%