2012
DOI: 10.1021/ja3043646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering a Rigid Protein Tunnel for Biomolecular Detection

Abstract: One intimidating challenge in protein nanopore-based technologies is designing robust protein scaffolds that remain functionally intact under a broad spectrum of detection conditions. Here, we show that an extensively engineered bacterial ferric hydroxamate uptake component A (FhuA), a β-barrel membrane protein, functions as a robust protein tunnel for the sampling of biomolecular events. The key implementation in this work was the coupling of direct genetic engineering with a refolding approach to produce an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
152
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
152
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to their biological interest they are increasingly relevant to biotechnology, serving as scaffolds for bacterial surface display (2,3) and atomically precise pores for nanopore-based DNA sequencing. Although the suitability of natural β-barrel membrane proteins for biotechnology has been improved by protein engineering (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10), the ability to design membrane proteins de novo would deliver tools customized to meet the demands of each application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their biological interest they are increasingly relevant to biotechnology, serving as scaffolds for bacterial surface display (2,3) and atomically precise pores for nanopore-based DNA sequencing. Although the suitability of natural β-barrel membrane proteins for biotechnology has been improved by protein engineering (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10), the ability to design membrane proteins de novo would deliver tools customized to meet the demands of each application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several new types of nanopores have been developed over the past several years [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] , biological protein pores and SS-nanopores are still the two mainstays in nanopore research. Protein pores have the advantages of uniform pore size, high reproducibility and the capacity for precise modification by site-directed mutagenesis, chemical modification and incorporation of unnatural amino acids, whereas SS-nanopores possess intrinsically high durability and tunable pore size and shape.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past decade has witnessed a burst of new nanopores made from different materials. These include biological nanopores such as Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A (MspA) 30 , phi29 connectors 31 , ferric hydroxamate uptake component A (FhuA) 32 and cytolysin A 33 ; carbon nanotubes [34][35][36] ; DNA nanostructures 37,38 ; organic macromolecules [39][40][41] ; and atomically thin 2D materials such as graphene [42][43][44] , boron nitride 45 and molybdenum disulfide 46 . Currently, most of the new nanopores are focused on nucleic acid analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die passende Selektivität für ein bestimmtes Biomolekül lässt sich über die Abmessungen der Nanopore festlegen. Dementsprechend wurden verschiedene biologische Membranproteine wie Areolysin, [2] Porin A aus Mycobacterium smegmatis (MspA), [3] ClyA, [4] FhuA, [5] membranadaptiertes phi29-Motorprotein [6] und SP1 [7] in nanoporenbasierten Analysesystemen eingesetzt. Eine andere Art von künstlichen Nanoporen sind Festkçrpernanoporen.…”
Section: Einführungunclassified