2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineered three-dimensional scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration in osteonecrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
0
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the application of the principles of healthcare engineering, a vital component of tissue engineering strategy is the scaffold, which serves as a template for interacting with surrounding tissue and providing structural support for the newly formed bone tissue [ 33 ]. The 3D structure of the scaffolds mimics the natural microenvironment and provides living space for cells, their porosity promotes recovery of blood supply and bone ingrowth, and their mechanical performance compensates for the insufficient support provided by the defect bone [ 34 ]. Nevertheless, ceramic scaffolds have the drawbacks of intrinsic brittleness, low resistance to crack propagation, and low bending strength which restrict the repair of challenging defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the application of the principles of healthcare engineering, a vital component of tissue engineering strategy is the scaffold, which serves as a template for interacting with surrounding tissue and providing structural support for the newly formed bone tissue [ 33 ]. The 3D structure of the scaffolds mimics the natural microenvironment and provides living space for cells, their porosity promotes recovery of blood supply and bone ingrowth, and their mechanical performance compensates for the insufficient support provided by the defect bone [ 34 ]. Nevertheless, ceramic scaffolds have the drawbacks of intrinsic brittleness, low resistance to crack propagation, and low bending strength which restrict the repair of challenging defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between scaffolds and surrounding tissue was initiated immediately upon implantation and influence the fate of the scaffolds throughout the entire healing process. Therefore, it is crucial to design an appropriate scaffold with proper surface attributes [ [165] , [166] , [167] ], aiming at modulating the host cell into a right phenotype at the host-scaffold interface.…”
Section: Harnessing the Power Of Macrophages For Enhanced Osteogenesimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the therapeutic efficacy is poor owing to its low mechanical strength and readily to be degraded by collagenase. Polymer-based artificial bone substitutes showing great potential in bone repair [ [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] ]. In comparison with previous materials, synthetic polymers have a range of advantages, such as controllable molecular mass and degradation time, excellent processability, and good mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%