2013
DOI: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineered Pichia pastoris for enhanced production of S-adenosylmethionine

Abstract: A genetically engineered strain of Pichia pastoris expressing S-adenosylmethionine synthetase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae under the control of AOX 1 promoter was developed. Induction of recombinant strain with 1% methanol resulted in the expression of SAM2 protein of ~ 42 kDa, whereas control GS115 showed no such band. Further, the recombinant strain showed 17-fold higher enzyme activity over control. Shake flask cultivation of engineered P. pastoris in BMGY medium supplemented with 1% L-methionine yiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The limiting factor of SAM synthesis is l ‐methionine, which is generally added directly to the fermentation medium (Hu et al, 2009; Kanai et al, 2017; Zhao, Shi, et al, 2016). In addition to the overexpression of S ‐adenosylmethionine synthetase, previous studies investigated various other strategies to improve the production of SAM, such as adding more l ‐methionine in the fermentation process (Huang et al, 2012; Kamarthapu et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2008; Zhao, Hang, et al, 2016; Zhao, Shi, et al, 2016), regulating the intracellular ATP concentration (Chen & Tan, 2018; Chen et al, 2017), or deleting the SPE2 gene (encoding SAM decarboxylase) (Balasundaram et al, 1994), GLC3 gene (encoding a glycogen branching enzyme) (Rowen et al, 1992; Zhao, Hang, et al, 2016) and SAH1 gene (encoding S ‐adenosyl‐ l ‐homocysteine hydrolase) (Ano et al, 2009; Mizunuma et al, 2004) to minimize SAM degradation and consumption (Chen et al, 2016; He et al, 2006; Zhao, Hang, et al, 2016; Zhao, Shi, et al, 2016). These strategies have achieved good results, but excessive supply of the precursors l ‐methionine and ATP, as well as the knockout of bypass pathway genes, will also inhibit cell growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting factor of SAM synthesis is l ‐methionine, which is generally added directly to the fermentation medium (Hu et al, 2009; Kanai et al, 2017; Zhao, Shi, et al, 2016). In addition to the overexpression of S ‐adenosylmethionine synthetase, previous studies investigated various other strategies to improve the production of SAM, such as adding more l ‐methionine in the fermentation process (Huang et al, 2012; Kamarthapu et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2008; Zhao, Hang, et al, 2016; Zhao, Shi, et al, 2016), regulating the intracellular ATP concentration (Chen & Tan, 2018; Chen et al, 2017), or deleting the SPE2 gene (encoding SAM decarboxylase) (Balasundaram et al, 1994), GLC3 gene (encoding a glycogen branching enzyme) (Rowen et al, 1992; Zhao, Hang, et al, 2016) and SAH1 gene (encoding S ‐adenosyl‐ l ‐homocysteine hydrolase) (Ano et al, 2009; Mizunuma et al, 2004) to minimize SAM degradation and consumption (Chen et al, 2016; He et al, 2006; Zhao, Hang, et al, 2016; Zhao, Shi, et al, 2016). These strategies have achieved good results, but excessive supply of the precursors l ‐methionine and ATP, as well as the knockout of bypass pathway genes, will also inhibit cell growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, many screened or genetically engineered yeast strains have been used to enhance SAM production (Chu et al, ; Chen, Wang, Cai, et al, ), such as the deletion of SPE2 encoding the S‐adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (Balasundaram, Dinman, Tabor, & Tabor, ) and GLC3 encoding a glycogen branching enzyme (Rowen, Meinke, & LaPorte, ), which are involved in SAM degradation and glycogen accumulation, respectively (Zhao, Hang, et al, ); the deletion of SAH1 encoding the S‐adenosyl‐ l ‐homocysteine hydrolase, which catalyzes the degradation of S‐adenosyl‐ l ‐homocysteine (Ano et al, ; Mizunuma, Miyamura, Hirata, Yokoyama, & Miyakawa, ) and the overexpression of S ‐adenosylmethionine synthetase (Chen, Wang, Wang, Dou, & Zhou, ; He, Deng, Zheng, & Gu, ; Zhao, Hang, et al, ; Zhao, Shi, et al, ) encoded by SAM2 , which catalyzes the transfer of the adenosyl group of ATP to the sulfur atom of methionine and was the rate‐limiting enzyme for SAM biosynthesis (Thomas, Rothstein, Rosenberg, & Surdin‐Kerjan, ). However, l ‐methionine was fed as the substrate for SAM production in most cases (Huang et al, ; Kamarthapu, Ragampeta, Rao, & Reddy, ; Zhang, Wang, Su, et al, ; Zhao, Hang, et al, ; Zhao, Shi, et al, ). Only one‐third of the price of l ‐methionine (Ren et al, ; Zhang, Gedicke, Kuznetsov, Staroverov, & Seidel‐Morgenstern, ), dl ‐methionine could be the cost‐saving substrate for industrial production of SAM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, a relatively high concentration of SAM, exceeding 1% (w/w), was achieved in the culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris (see Table 2). However, the drawbacks of using yeast as microbial catalysis are obvious: the expensive L-Met substrate needs to be added, and the SAM productivity is relatively low [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%