2014
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineered Nanoscale Food Ingredients: Evaluation of Current Knowledge on Material Characteristics Relevant to Uptake from the Gastrointestinal Tract

Abstract: Abstract:The NanoRelease Food Additive project developed a catalog to identify potential engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) used as ingredients, using various food-related databases. To avoid ongoing debate on defining the term nanomaterial, NanoRelease did not use any specific definition other than the ingredient is not naturally part of the food chain, and its dimensions are measured in the nanoscale. Potential nanomaterials were categorized based on physical similarity; analysis indicated that the range of ENM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…104 Dimensions Food nanoparticles vary considerably in their dimensions, ranging from a few nanometers (surfactant micelles) to a few hundred nanometers (lipid, protein, or carbohydrate nanoparticles), depending on the materials and processes used to create them. 8 Nanoparticle dimensions influence their GIT fate and toxicity through a number of mechanisms. 6,105,106 First, smaller nanoparticles are usually dissolved or digested more rapidly in GIT fluids than larger ones with similar compositions.…”
Section: Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…104 Dimensions Food nanoparticles vary considerably in their dimensions, ranging from a few nanometers (surfactant micelles) to a few hundred nanometers (lipid, protein, or carbohydrate nanoparticles), depending on the materials and processes used to create them. 8 Nanoparticle dimensions influence their GIT fate and toxicity through a number of mechanisms. 6,105,106 First, smaller nanoparticles are usually dissolved or digested more rapidly in GIT fluids than larger ones with similar compositions.…”
Section: Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIT effects After ingestion, nanoparticles travel through the complicated environment of the GIT before they are absorbed or exhibit their toxic effects 8 (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Food Matrix and Git Effects On Nanoparticle Characteristics mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, by selecting PS-NPs with different surface modifications (aminated, carboxylated and unmodified), we were able to determine their relative impact on the absorption of the NPs. Ideally, these studies should also be performed with other NPs for which oral exposure is more likely, such as biopolymeric NPs used in edible coatings and films [1], or silver NPs or silicon dioxide NPs from migration from food contact materials [43]. However, determining the digestion and absorption of these type of NPs presents additional analytical challenges and needs to be addressed in future research.…”
Section: Prediction Of Oral Absorption Of Nanoparticles From Biorelevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food is naturally chemically complex and consists of biological polymers with dimensions in the nanometer size range. To avoid the complication of integrating the different jurisdictional definitions, or lack thereof, that distinguishes engineered NMs from chemicals found naturally in food, the NanoRelease Food Additive project defined three broad categories of engineered nanomaterials: metal/mineral-based NMs, soft lipid NMs and solid biochemical macromolecule NMs including new proteins, polysaccharides and nucleic acids (Yada et al, 2014). A specific size range was not defined to allow the identification of methods relevant to a broad range of sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%