of Sciences (2008) (the first woman to be elected to all three), the 2011 NAE Draper Prize (the first woman to receive it), and the 2016 Millennium Technology Prize (first woman to win). At the time of this writing, Google Scholar reports her co-authored publications receiving over 50,000 citations, with an h-index of 122. She is co-founder of Gevo, Inc (producing carbon-neutral biofuels) 3 and Provivi (producing environmentally safe biopesticides), 4 and was recently appointed to the board of directors for Alphabet, Inc (the parent company of Google). 5Many edited texts and countless review articles describe directed evolution techniques and applications (e.g., References 6-9 ). While many key players have emerged in this field throughout the years (most with research ties to Frances), the Arnold lab has always been at the forefront, melding molecular biology, chemistry, and biomolecular engineering to "one-up" nature and create novel and often extraordinary biocatalysts. At the same time, Arnold and coworkers continuously push the envelope with regard to method development and mechanistic understanding, thus offering the protein engineering community proven strategies for, and new insights into, molecular evolution. In the following paragraphs, we summarize the "evolution" of research in the Arnold lab and discuss her legacy as a protein pioneer and a devoted mentor.The concept of a directed evolution experiment is rather simple-create a library of mutant genes (as compared to a parent gene), and screen or select for those mutants (offspring) which confer an improved property of interest. Then, repeat (refer to journal cover image). This was not a novel idea in 1991 when the Arnold lab first reported examples of evolving an enzyme (subtilisin E) for enhanced activity and stability in organic solvent. 10-13 At the time, however, the practice of directed evolution was not easily implemented, and its potential was not yet appreciated by the protein engineering community. Implementing this simple concept was not simple. How could, or should, mutant libraries be constructed? How large or diverse should they be? How does one search through such libraries for the rare improvements, in a reasonable timeframe? Are there limits to evolving protein properties or reaction chemistries? Frances, her students, and her post docs sought to answer such questions, riding waves of advances in molecular and cell biology, synthetic biology, and computational methods (among others). The early years of research following her initial subtilisin studies furnished numerous, now prevalent directed evolution techniques, both for library creation and for library screening. The formalization of such methods led to the publication in 2003 of two volumes of directed evolution protocols, edited by Frances Arnold and GeorgeGeorgiou. 14 Through the years, these volumes have served as "directed evolution 101" for many labs. A wide variety of enzymes have served as targets of directed evolution in the Arnold lab (e.g., proteases, esterases, oxygena...