Engineered Bioretention for Removal of Nitrate From Stormwater Runoff

Abstract

Control of nitrate from urban stormwater runoff can have a significant impact on nitrate levels in local waters. One option for providing treatment to urban stormwater runoff is bioretention, a simple plant-and soil-based low impact treatment/infiltration facility. The goal of this study is to re-engineer the concept of bioretention to remove nitrate from urban runoff. Specifically, a modification to incorporate a continuously submerged anoxic zone with an overdrain is being evaluated for its capacity for nitrate removal via denitrification. Work to date has focused on selecting an electron donor and carbon source that will promote significant denitrification and be stable for extended periods of time in the subsurface. The electron donor and carbon source to be used in bioretention must be readily metabolizable, as well as low cost and readily available. Two sets of organic substrates for chemoorganotrophic denitrifying bacteria were evaluated: Set #1, alfalfa, newspaper, and leaf mulch compost; and Set #2, sawdust, wood chips, and wheat straw. An inorganic substrate for chemolithotrophic denitrifying bacteria, sulfur, was evaluated in experimental Set #3, in three configurations: large sulfur particles (2 to 2.36 mm) alone, large sulfur particles with limestone, and small sulfur particles (0.6 to 1.18 mm) with limestone. All materials were uniformly mixed with washed silica sand and transferred into 40 cm long by 6.4 cm inner diameter Plexiglas columns. A total of 4 columns were used for each experimental set, including a control column packed with washed silica sand only. The columns were seeded with the supernatant of settled secondary effluent and fed anoxic synthetic stormwater runoff. Based on the Set#1 and Set#2 experiments for the organic substrates, excellent nitrate removal was observed in columns containing alfalfa, newspaper, wheat straw, wood chips, and sawdust. However, based on total nitrogen removal and other water quality characteristics, newspaper and wood chips are the best candidates out of these sets. In Set#3, significantly better nitrate removal occurred in the column with the small sulfur particles/limestone compared to the large sulfur particles, probably as a result of the increased surface area of the sulfur available per unit volume of reactor. Further studies will be performed using the electron donors that gave the best nitrate removal efficiency and effluent quality in the experiments reported here: newspaper, wood chips, and small sulfur particles/limestone.

A Field Evaluation of Rain Garden Flow and Pollutant Treatment

“…Although the redox potential was suitable for denitrification, it is possible that soil-water contact time was too short due to rapid infiltration rates, or a suitable electron donor was not present in large enough concentrations to allow denitrification to occur. Kim et al (2003) reported NO 3 -N removal of up to 80% when shredded newspaper was added to rain garden soils in laboratory soil columns.…”

Intermittent rainstorms cause pulses of nitrogen, phosphorus, and copper in leachate from compost in bioretention systems

“…These systems modulate peak flow through on-site retention of stormwater, and remove contaminants from stormwater through sorption, and biological uptake and degradation (Roy-Poirier et al, 2010). Compost is a valuable amendment to bioretention systems (Kim et al, 2003;Hinman, 2013;Palmer et al, 2013). Compost is beneficial for plant growth in bioretention systems as it provides nutrients, and improves water holding capacity and soil structure.…”

Reliability analysis of nutrient removal from stormwater runoff with green sorption media under varying influent conditions

“…A wide variety of sorption media have been effective at reducing nutrient levels for stormwater, including recycled material mixtures ; mineral-based mixtures such as marble chips (Sengupta and Ergas, 2006) and oyster shells (Namasivayam et al, 2005), and organic materials such as leaf mulch (Ray et al, 2006), wood chips (Seelsaen et al, 2006) and alfalfa (Kim et al, 2000). Such media were selected for testing, which was composed of clay, sand, organic materials, or engineered compounds to remove more soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) and total phosphorus (TP) Xuan et al, 2009a;Chang et al, 2010).…”