Engineered biomaterial and biophysical stimulation as combinatorial strategies to address prosthetic infection by pathogenic bacteria

Abstract

A plethora of antimicrobial strategies are being developed to address prosthetic infection. The currently available methods for implant infection treatment include the use of antibiotics and revision surgery. Among the bacterial strains, Staphylococcus species pose significant challenges particularly, with regard to hospital acquired infections. In order to combat such life threatening infectious diseases, researchers have developed implantable biomaterials incorporating nanoparticles, antimicrobial reinforcements, surface coatings, slippery/non-adhesive and contact killing surfaces. This review discusses a few of the biomaterial and biophysical antimicrobial strategies, which are in the developmental stage and actively being pursued by several research groups. The clinical efficacy of biophysical stimulation methods such as ultrasound, electric and magnetic field treatments against prosthetic infection depends critically on the stimulation protocol and parameters of the treatment modality. A common thread among the three biophysical stimulation methods is the mechanism of bactericidal action, which is centered on biophysical rupture of bacterial membranes, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and bacterial membrane depolarization evoked by the interference of essential ion-transport. Although the extent of antimicrobial effect, normally achieved through biophysical stimulation protocol is insufficient to warrant therapeutic application, a combination of antibiotic/ROS inducing agents and biophysical stimulation methods can elicit a clinically relevant reduction in viable bacterial numbers. In this review, we present a detailed account of both the biomaterial and biophysical approaches for achieving maximum bacterial inactivation. Summarizing, the biophysical stimulation methods in a combinatorial manner with material based strategies can be a more potent solution to control bacterial infections. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 2174-2190, 2017.

Electrospraying an enabling technology for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications: A review

“…A brief summary of antimicrobial surface modifications including non-adhesive slippery coatings and contact killing surfaces is deliberated in a separate review (Boda & Basu, 2017). ES can be utilized to create such antimicrobial surface coatings.…”

Electroactive Smart Materials: Novel Tools for Tailoring Bacteria Behavior and Fight Antimicrobial Resistance

“…These strategies however require the direct application of an electrical field on bacterial solution, which may not be recommendable for in vivo applications. Similarly to other stimuli previously mentioned the formation of reactive oxidative species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) was also indicated as a possible mechanism of action for the bactericidal effect of low strength electric field (Boda and Basu, 2017).…”

“…The influence of magnetic field on biological systems, namely on biomolecules, cells and living organisms, is an important field of research due to the emergence of electromagnetic pollution in the form of low and high radio frequency magnetic fields from electronic devices (Boda and Basu, 2017). It is believed that magnetic field interfere with the mechanism of ion transport via membrane channel proteins, leading to osmotic imbalance and membrane rupture.…”

Engineering and Application Perspectives on Designing an Antimicrobial Surface

“…Extensive use of these reagents has caused concern for environmental pollution and potential microbial drug resistance. 5 Furthermore, once microbes were attached and concentrated on a surface, a notorious biofilm would be developed. Conventional antimicrobial agents such as antibiotics were known for treating planktonic microbe infection but became insufficient to inhibit or eliminate a biofilm.…”