2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging primary care professionals in suicide prevention: A qualitative study

Abstract: In health systems with strongly developed primary care, such as in the Netherlands, effectively engaging primary care professionals (PCPs) in suicide prevention is a key strategy. As part of the national Suicide Prevention Action Network (SUPRANET), a program was offered to PCPs in six regions in the Netherlands in 2017–2018 to more effectively engage them in suicide prevention. This implementation study aimed to evaluate to what extent SUPRANET was helpful in supporting PCPs to apply suicide prevention practi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since many medical professionals do not feel confident assessing suicidality [65,66], we recommend using validated, standardized instruments as much as possible. For routine screening, self-administered versions of these instruments can be used, or the questions asked by ancillary staff (e.g., medical assistants) but for more urgent situations, the healthcare professional should ask the questions themselves.…”
Section: How Should Patients Be Screened or Assessed? What Issues Should Clinicians Pay Attention To Or Ask About?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since many medical professionals do not feel confident assessing suicidality [65,66], we recommend using validated, standardized instruments as much as possible. For routine screening, self-administered versions of these instruments can be used, or the questions asked by ancillary staff (e.g., medical assistants) but for more urgent situations, the healthcare professional should ask the questions themselves.…”
Section: How Should Patients Be Screened or Assessed? What Issues Should Clinicians Pay Attention To Or Ask About?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational, attitudinal, logistical, financial, and legal barriers impede optimal care. Healthcare providers readily admit they are not confident about diagnosing and managing both ME/CFS [4] and suicidality [65,66]. Hopefully, the process outlined (Figure 1) and detailed in this article advances practitioners' knowledge about suicidality and supplies them with a straightforward care plan.…”
Section: Clinical Care Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet research has illustrated how GPs, who remain the first point of contact for people with mental health problems, may have insufficient time, tools and resources to appropriately support people with complex psycho-social needs [ 31 ]. Educating primary care professionals on suicide prevention is beneficial [ 32 ], but improved connections between community mental health services and primary care are also key [ 33 , 34 ]. This is supported by a systematic review of the role of GPs in the management of patients who self-harm, identifying a need for GP training, enhanced communication between primary care and mental health teams and enhanced service provision [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of concern is the body of literature that relating to a lack of education and support for primary care physicians in how to recognise and manage the care of patients in distress [ 15 , 47 , 48 ]. A recent qualitative evaluation of suicide prevention in primary care within the Netherlands emphasised the need for suicide prevention strategies at primary care to include improved liaison with mental health services and primary care [ 49 ]. In a second qualitative study, Leavey et al [ 50 ] also suggest that there is concern that GPs in the UK lack confidence in their recognition and management of suicidal patients, with several issues raised around the relationships and information flow between GPs and other parts of the health care system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%