Engaging primary care practitioners in quality improvement: making explicit the program theory of an interprofessional education intervention

Abstract

BackgroundThe scientific literature continues to advocate interprofessional collaboration (IPC) as a key component of primary care. It is recommended that primary care groups be created and configured to meet the healthcare needs of the patient population, as defined by patient demographics and other data analyses related to the health of the population being served. It is further recommended that the improvement of primary care services be supported by the delivery of feedback and performance measurements. This paper describes the theory underlying an interprofessional educational intervention developed in Quebec’s Montérégie region (Canada) for the purpose of improving chronic disease management in primary care. The objectives of this study were to explain explicitly the theory underlying this intervention, to describe its components in detail and to assess the intervention’s feasibility and acceptability.MethodA program impact theory-driven evaluation approach was used. Multiple sources of information were examined to make explicit the theory underlying the education intervention: 1) a literature review and a review of documents describing the program’s development; 2) regular attendance at the project’s committee meetings; 3) direct observation of the workshops; 4) interviews of workshop participants; and 5) focus groups with workshop facilitators. Qualitative data collected were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsThe theoretical basis of the interprofessional education intervention was found to be work motivation theory and reflective learning. Five themes describing the workshop objectives emerged from the qualitative analysis of the interviews conducted with the workshop participants. These five themes were the importance of: 1) adopting a regional perspective, 2) reflecting, 3) recognizing gaps between practice and guidelines, 4) collaborating, and 5) identifying possible practice improvements. The team experienced few challenges implementing the intervention. However, the workshop’s acceptability was found to be very good.ConclusionOur observation of the workshop sessions and the interviews conducted with the participants confirmed that the objectives of the education intervention indeed targeted the improvement of interprofessional collaboration and quality of care. However, it is clear that a three-hour workshop alone cannot lead to major changes in practice. Long-term interventions are needed to support this complex change process.

A Scoping Review of Facilitators of Multi-Professional Collaboration in Primary Care

“…To build trusting relationships and identify problem areas and inherent capabilities for collaboration, professionals must spend time together [67]. We found several examples indicating the importance of investing time in building professional relationships.…”

“…Measures that enhance cooperation between national and local authorities in ways that improve the capability of municipalities to establish supportive relationships with HCPs is necessary to contain costs, improve the quality of care and offer more population-suitable care [7475]. For example, engaging in the implementation of common procedures and legislation for MPC is a managerial role, commencing with an evaluation of the quality of care services and establishing remuneration plans that support teamwork, local quality improvement and the inter-professional sharing of knowledge [67]. Next, it is important to improve knowledge about the level at which organisational management should be placed and how managers should become involved in centralised or distributed decision-making.…”

Patient partnership in quality improvement of healthcare services: Patients’ inputs and challenges faced

“…After discussion, deliberation, and the exchange of views, priorities are chosen by consensus and translated into a SMART goal (Specific, Measurable, Attractive, Realistic, and Time-bound) that can be carried out in three to four months. Following this phase, the members draft a project development template 36 .…”

Evaluating implementation and impact of a provincial quality improvement collaborative for the management of chronic diseases in primary care: the COMPAS+ study protocol

“…The QICs being investigated in the current study are based on an initial demonstration project conducted in Quebec's Montérégie region (2008-2014) called the COMPAS (Collective for best practices and improvement in primary care services) program [32]. The program's main goals were to engage primary care providers in continuous QI, improve interprofessional collaboration, and enhance the quality of care for priority chronic diseases [32].…”