Engaging national organizations for knowledge translation: Comparative case studies in knowledge value mapping

Abstract

BackgroundGovernment sponsors of research and development, along with their funded investigators, are increasingly tasked with demonstrating evidence of knowledge use by nontraditional audiences. This requires efforts to translate their findings for effective communication. For technology-related knowledge, these audiences include clinicians, consumers, manufacturers, public policy agencies, and knowledge brokers. One potentially efficient approach is to communicate research findings through relevant national organizations. However, this requires an understanding of how such organizations view and treat research knowledge, which can be determined through knowledge-value mapping. Do knowledge values differ between national organizations representing different audiences? Can a deeper understanding of knowledge values help sponsors, investigators, and organizations better communicate research findings to stakeholders?MethodsA series of comparative case studies on knowledge-value mapping were derived through interviews with spokespersons for six national organizations. The semi-structured interviews followed a 10-item questionnaire to characterize different ways in which each organization engages with research-based knowledge. Each participating organization represents a particular stakeholder group, while all share a common interest in the research subject matter.ResultsEach national organization considers the value of the research knowledge in the context of their organization's mission and the interests of their members. All are interested in collaborating with researchers to share relevant findings, while they vary along the following dimensions of knowledge engagement: create, identify, translate, adapt, communicate, use, promote, absorptive capacity, and recommendations for facilitation.ConclusionsThe principles of knowledge translation suggest that investigators can increase use by tailoring the format and context of their findings to the absorptive capacity of nonscholars. Greater absorption should result in higher levels of knowledge awareness, interest, and use, which can then be documented. National organizations and their members, in turn, can strive to optimize their absorptive capacities regarding the state of the sciences. This combination will ensure the highest possible return on public investment in research activities. This knowledge-value mapping study concludes that national organizations are appropriate channels for communicating research findings and for meeting statutory requirements and general expectations for generating and documenting knowledge use.

Evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge brokering in health research: a systematised review with some bibliometric information

“…They reported that more than half of the agencies linked researchers to policymakers. Similarly, Lane and Rogers uncovered that government agencies and national organisations successfully brokered research knowledge to clinicians and practitioners, consumers and families, policymakers, educators and employers, manufacturers and other research knowledge users. The effect of their brokering included the creation and revision of industry standards and clinical protocols, building of laboratory instruments and clinical tools, designing of new and improved services and informing policy and practice …”

Participants’ perceptions of a knowledge-brokering strategy to facilitate evidence-informed policy-making in Fiji

“…The study findings identified a number of positive outcomes from the engagement processes used in knowledge-brokering activities in TROPIC as the approach was quite different from other knowledge-brokering approaches that have been described [45,49,56]. In addition, while organisational barriers limited the impact of using evidence in the development of policy or advocacy statements, the challenge was to introduce appropriate research tools that supported the use of sound and relevant evidence as highlighted by others [40,43].…”

Knowledge brokering between researchers and policymakers in Fiji to develop policies to reduce obesity: a process evaluation

“…The processes of engaging researchers and knowledge-users in the TROPIC program is quite different from others [34,64]. The involvement of higher-level officers such as government ministers or permanent secretaries (deputy ministers) in government departments and executive officers and/or directors in non-government organizations at the initial stage of the project (consultations and endorsement of partnership) was a critical factor in gaining access to key people (departmental heads or focal points).…”