2003
DOI: 10.2307/20033681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging Failing States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the growth and recruitment activities of terrorist groups (Crocker 2003;Diamond 2002;Fukuyama 2004;Hamre and Sullivan 2002;Kahler 2002;Mallaby 2002;Rotberg 2002;Sanderson 2004;Takeyh and Gvosdev 2002). These authors, consequently, argue in favor of robust multi-or unilateral intervention to prevent state failure and proscribe a range of policy courses, such as: building stable democratic institutions, increasing economic assistance, multilateral military intervention, and the creation of an American empire.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the growth and recruitment activities of terrorist groups (Crocker 2003;Diamond 2002;Fukuyama 2004;Hamre and Sullivan 2002;Kahler 2002;Mallaby 2002;Rotberg 2002;Sanderson 2004;Takeyh and Gvosdev 2002). These authors, consequently, argue in favor of robust multi-or unilateral intervention to prevent state failure and proscribe a range of policy courses, such as: building stable democratic institutions, increasing economic assistance, multilateral military intervention, and the creation of an American empire.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contributes to regional insecurity, weapons proliferation, narcotics trafficking, and terrorism. 70 Chester Crocker…”
Section: Strategic Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect of the debate on state failure deals with how to fix failed or fragile states (Helman and Ratner 1992/93;Zartman 1995;Fukuyama 2004;Krasner and Pascual 2005;Rotberg 2003;Crocker 2003). The main thesis of these studies is that, in this globalized world, there is an urgent need to fill a gap caused by an inconsistency between the de jure system of state sovereignty and the de facto nature of many post-colonial states in Africa and elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%