2017
DOI: 10.1177/0170840616677634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging and Misbehaving: How Dignity Affects Employee Work Behaviors

Abstract: While there has been a growing body of research on workplace dignity, the majority of studies tend to focus on how dignity is experienced by organizational members, paying considerably less attention to consequences for organizations. In this study, we explore the influence of workplace dignity on employee work behaviors that affect organizational performance. Framing our inquiry with Sharon Bolton’s yet-untested multidimensional theory of dignity, we analyze Randy Hodson’s content-coded ethnographic data to r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing work on dignity in business ethics (e.g. Lucas 2015;Lucas et al 2013Lucas et al , 2017 has cited but not really engaged with Sayer's comprehensive conceptual oeuvre that includes moral sentiments, socialization, virtues, character, norms, stories, reasonability, social relations, social structure, and power.…”
Section: Dialogue 1: Boundaries Between Moral Immoral and Nonmoralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing work on dignity in business ethics (e.g. Lucas 2015;Lucas et al 2013Lucas et al , 2017 has cited but not really engaged with Sayer's comprehensive conceptual oeuvre that includes moral sentiments, socialization, virtues, character, norms, stories, reasonability, social relations, social structure, and power.…”
Section: Dialogue 1: Boundaries Between Moral Immoral and Nonmoralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A central problem, in this case, emerges when street level bureaucrats or contractors perform tasks that are inconsistent with public value ‘safeguards’ (Rohr, 1986; Rutgers, 2010) or organizational values (Vardi and Wiener, 1996). They might engage in non-conforming behavior for good or ill (Lucas et al, 2017). One might also argue that such actions violate some implied social contract or term of employment.…”
Section: Plot Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, spaces for resistance are contextualized around insiders experiencing an ethical dilemma or change in perception of the workplace more generally (Lucas et al, 2017). As mentioned earlier, there has not yet been enough consideration given to the disparities that emerge from being external to an organization.…”
Section: Plot Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karlsson (2012) explained that when employees are exposed to negative conditions that undermine their worth, they are likely to respond by taking steps to restore their dignity or to retaliate against the organization for harming their dignity. Previous workplace dignity research demonstrates a range of resistance strategies such as unionizing (Stuesse, 2010), articulating cynicism against management (Fleming, 2005), quitting (Cleaveland, 2005), sabotage (Hodson, 2001), and engaging in counterproductive work behaviours (Lucas, Manikas, Mattingly, & Crider, 2017).…”
Section: Workplace Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%