Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study

Abstract

Plain English summary Researchers have explored different types of treatment to help people with a mental illness with other problems they might be experiencing, such as their health condition and quality of life. Care models that involve many different health care providers working together to provide complete physical and mental health care are becoming popular. There has been a push from the research community to understand the value of including people with lived experience in such programs. While research suggests that people with lived experience may help a patient’s treatment, there is little evidence on including them in a team based program. This paper describes how our research team included a person with lived experience of psychosis in both the research and care process. We list some guiding principles we used to work through some of the common challenges that are mentioned in research. Lastly, experiences from the research team, lessons learned, and a personal statement from the person with lived experience (AA) are provided to help future researchers and people with lived experience collaborate in research and healthcare. Abstract Background In our current healthcare system, people with a mental illness experience poorer physical health and early mortality in part due to the inconsistent collaboration between primary care and specialized mental health care. In efforts to bridge this gap, hospitals and primary care settings have begun to take an integrated approach to care by implementing collaborative care models to treat a variety of conditions in the past decade. The collaborative care model addresses common barriers to treatment, such as geographical distance and lack of individualized, evidence-based, measurement-based treatment. Person(s) with lived experience (PWLE) are regarded as ‘experts by experience’ in the scope of their first-hand experience with a diagnosis or health condition. Research suggests that including PWLE in a patient’s care and treatment has significant contributions to the patient’s treatment and overall outcome. However, there is minimal evidence of including PWLE in collaborative care models. This paper describes the inclusion of a PWLE in a research study and collaborative care team for youth with early psychosis. Aims To discuss the active involvement of a PWLE on the research and collaborative care team and to describe the research team’s experiences and perspectives to facilitate future collaborations. Method This paper describes the inclusion of a PWLE on our research team. We provide a selective review of the literature on several global initiatives of including PWLE in different facets of the healthcare system. Additionally, we outline multiple challenges of involving PWLE in research and service delivery. Examples are provided on how recruitment and involvement was facilitated, with the guidance of several principles. Lastly, we have included a narrative note from the PWLE included in our study, who is also a contributing author to this paper (AA), where she comments on her experience in the research study. Conclusion Including PWLE in active roles in research studies and collaborative care teams can enhance the experience of the researchers, collaborative care team members, and PWLE. We showcase our method to empower other researchers and service providers to continue to seek guidance from PWLE to provide more comprehensive, collaborative care with better health outcomes for the patient, and a more satisfying care experience for the provider.

A Qualitative Study Exploring Access to Mental Health and Substance Use Support among Individuals Experiencing Homelessness during COVID-19

“…Our findings suggest that the instability around circumstances and needs requires recognition from service providers during times of heightened adversity. Participants’ suggestions of hiring and training people with lived experience could be one way to better target provision; existing evidence demonstrates improved treatment outcomes in mental health and substance use support when lived experience is integrated within care provision [ 27 , 67 , 68 ].…”

Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study

“…The category of people with lived experience refers to people who have a diagnosis of mental illness. Inclusion of this area of expertise was meant to provide a fuller perspective on the potential ethical impacts of digital phenotyping [ 91 ]. For this category, we also looked for people with some experience in mental health advocacy or policy as a foundation for discussing potential ethical issues, such as privacy or consent, relevant to digital phenotyping.…”

Technology‐enabled collaborative care for youth with early psychosis: Results of a feasibility study to improve physical health behaviours

“…Based on our findings, our intervention is a first step in developing a novel model of care for youth with early psychosis (i.e., VCT, peer mentor; Vojtila et al, 2021). This study presents encouraging results for perceived benefit; however, larger studies are required to measure these effects with better precision, potential tailoring of the intervention duration, as well as longer duration of follow‐up to allow for change in health behaviours to occur.…”