2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement of the left extrastriate body area during body-part metaphor comprehension

Abstract: Grounded cognition explanations of metaphor comprehension predict activation of sensorimotor cortices relevant to the metaphor's source domain. We tested this prediction for body-part metaphors using functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants heard sentences containing metaphorical or literal references to body parts, and comparable control sentences. Localizer scans identified body-part-specific motor, somatosensory and visual cortical regions. Both subject- and item-wise analyses showed that, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(152 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore propose that the recruitment of occipital regions in the blind, even for higher cognitive abilities, finds its "neural niche" in a set of circuits that are sufficiently close to the required function and sufficiently plastic so as to strengthen or reorient a significant proportion of their neural resources for the non-visual function (Collignon et al, 2009). Interestingly, this raises the possibility that other higher cognitive domains such as language, which is also known to remap in the occipital cortex of the blind (Bedny et al, 2011;R€ oder et al, 2002), are also grounded in the native computational predisposition of these regions (Hasson et al, 2016;Lacey et al, 2012Lacey et al, , 2017van Ackeren et al, 2017). However, as activation per se does not necessarily imply a functional use (Lasne et al, 2018), future studies are needed to further explore and directly test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore propose that the recruitment of occipital regions in the blind, even for higher cognitive abilities, finds its "neural niche" in a set of circuits that are sufficiently close to the required function and sufficiently plastic so as to strengthen or reorient a significant proportion of their neural resources for the non-visual function (Collignon et al, 2009). Interestingly, this raises the possibility that other higher cognitive domains such as language, which is also known to remap in the occipital cortex of the blind (Bedny et al, 2011;R€ oder et al, 2002), are also grounded in the native computational predisposition of these regions (Hasson et al, 2016;Lacey et al, 2012Lacey et al, , 2017van Ackeren et al, 2017). However, as activation per se does not necessarily imply a functional use (Lasne et al, 2018), future studies are needed to further explore and directly test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often metaphors are related to sensation and, thus, associated with brain activity in sensory regions. For example, "body" areas in secondary visual cortex are active during the comprehension of metaphors that are related to body parts (Lacey et al, 2017). Similarly, lexical items referring to olfaction can activate olfactory orbitofrontal cortex in case of both metaphorical and literal context (Pomp et al, 2018).…”
Section: Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM), has been found to activate the fusiform gyrus, the precuneus and the middle frontal gyrus in the left hemisphere, as well as the precentral and superior frontal gyri in the right hemisphere and the right cerebellum (McCrea, 2007). Also, metaphorical references to body parts evoke specific activity in the left extrastriate body area (EBA), which activity is driven by an ipsilateral semantic network (Lacey et al, 2017). Spatial relation among the body parts, which allows for building up the BSR, mainly relies on the activation of the left posterior intraparietal sulcus (Corradi-Dell'Acqua et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%