Engagement of families in treatment for childhood conduct problems

Miller, Gloria E.; Prinz, Ronald J.

doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(03)80033-3

Cited by 113 publications

(106 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Bloomquist and colleagues (2012) found that a strong predictor of family participation was the expectancy of the program to be centered on the parent. Parents who had an expectation that the intervention should be directed at the child were more likely to drop out of a parenting-focused intervention than those who had an expectation for parenting skills (Miller & Prinz, 2003). These findings are in line with other research findings (e.g., Garvey et al, 2006) that show that parents participate in prevention programs because they are seeking help with parenting.…”

Section: Organizational Constraints and Intervention Factors Related supporting

confidence: 88%

“…In what concerns motivation, there is some evidence regarding its impact on parent attendance at preventive interventions for youth substance use and other problem behaviors. Corroborating previous research (e.g., Miller & Prinz 2003;Nock and Photos 2006), Bloomquist and colleagues (2012) concluded that high attending parents were those who were highly motivated and had expectancies of the program to be focused on the parent. Another study also found that parents with lower parenting self-efficacy attended a greater number of preventive intervention sescon la mayoría de estudios realizados sobre este tema puede estar relacionado con diferencias en las estrategias de comunicación y motivación.…”

Section: Parenting Characteristics and Participationmentioning

confidence: 81%

“…Participation is less likely when parents are more prone to conceptualize child's problem behaviors as being attributable to child factors than to their own parenting practices (Morrissey-Kane & Prinz, 1999). In the same way, parents of youngsters who attributed these problem behaviors to child factors external to the parent were more likely to drop out of the preventive intervention compared to interventions that focused exclusively on the child (Miller & Prinz, 2003).…”

Section: Parenting Characteristics and Participationmentioning

confidence: 96%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Negreiros

2013

Ped Soc. Rev Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

participación parental en intervenciones familiares preventivas de toxicodependencias: una revisión bibliográfica empírica [ 39 ] sips -pedagogia social. revista interuniversitaria [1139-1723 (2013) Jorge NegreirosUniversidad de Oporto RESUMEN: El uso y el abuso de drogas son muy habituales en la adolescencia. Los padres desempeñan un importante papel en el consumo de drogas, tanto incitando a su consumo como fomentando la protección y la resiliencia. Las intervenciones familiares han demostrado ser un enfoque beneficioso en la prevención del consumo adolescente y otras conductas problemáticas de la adolescencia. No obstante, los bajos índices de participación representan una importante amenaza a la validez de las intervenciones familiares preventivas. Desde hace tiempo se viene reconociendo que uno de los principales problemas para la realización de intervenciones familiares es la captación, retención y participación de los progenitores. Aparte de esto, se ha visto que una mayor participación de los padres en las formaciones de prevención para progenitores está asociada a un efecto duradero sobre la conducta adolescente. Identificar específicamente lo que determina que la familia se implique y participe en los programas de prevención familiares es de máxima importancia, puesto que la implicación de los padres puede ser un factor de pronóstico de la eficacia del programa. Últi-mamente se ha prestado más atención a entender de qué manera los factores individuales, contextuales y de intervención pueden predecir la participación parental en las intervenciones familiares de prevención de drogodependencias. Los estudios sobre los factores de pronóstico de participación son útiles para identificar a aquellos individuos que hallan en mayor riesgo de abandonar. En este trabajo ofrecemos un repaso de la evolución más reciente de los diversos factores de pronóstico de la participación familiar en programas preventivos de consumo de drogas y otros problemas. A partir de los determinantes específicos y dinámicos de la participación que se estudian en este trabajo, al final proponemos un marco teórico de la participación familiar que presenta cuatro componentes básicos: (1) patrones de interacción familiar; (2) conocimiento y percepciones de los padres sobre los problemas conductuales de los hijos; (3) variables psicológicas de los hijos; y (4) percepciones de los padres sobre la intervención preventiva.PALABRAS CLAVE: Prevención de consumo de drogodependencias, intervención familiar, factores de pronóstico, participación parental.ABSTRACT: Substance use and misuse are very common in adolescence. Parents play an important part in substance use, both through inducing risk or promoting protection and resilience. Family-based interventions have proven to be a useful approach to prevent adolescent substance use and other youth problem behaviors. However, low participation rates are an important threat to the validity of family-based preventive interventions. It has long been recognized that one of the major problems in imp...

show abstract

Section: Organizational Constraints and Intervention Factors Related supporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Parenting Characteristics and Participationmentioning

confidence: 81%

Section: Parenting Characteristics and Participationmentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Negreiros

2013

Ped Soc. Rev Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, parents with more internal parent-referent attributional styles (i.e., they view their lack of parenting skills as the cause of their child's behavior problems) have been found more likely to complete treatment (Peters et al, 2005). On the opposite spectrum, higher dropout rates for parents with negative child-referent attributions have been reported (Miller & Prinz, 2003). However, questions remain about the link between attributional style and engagement in treatment as other studies have found no relationship between parent-referent attribution styles and treatment participation (Nordstrom, Dumas, & Gitter, 2008;Williford, Graves, Shelton, & Woods, 2009).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting Treatment Success in Child and Parent Therapy Among Families in Poverty

Mattek

Harris

Fox

2016

The Journal of Genetic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Behavior problems are prevalent in young children and those living in poverty are at increased risk for stable, high-intensity behavioral problems. Research has demonstrated that participation in child and parent therapy (CPT) programs significantly reduces problematic child behaviors while increasing positive behaviors. However, CPT programs, particularly those implemented with low-income populations, frequently report high rates of attrition (over 50%). Parental attributional style has shown some promise as a contributing factor to treatment attendance and termination in previous research. The current study examined if parental attributional style could predict treatment success in a CPT program, specifically targeting low-income urban children with behavior problems. A hierarchical logistic regression was used with a sample of 425 families to assess if parent-referent and childreferent attributions variables predicted treatment success over and above NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; this is the author's final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation at the bottom of the page. 2 demographic variables and symptom severity. Parent referent attributions, child-referent attributions, and child symptom severity were found to be significant predictors of treatment success. Results indicated that caregivers who viewed themselves as a contributing factor for their child's behavior problems were significantly more likely to demonstrate treatment success. Alternatively, caregivers who viewed their child as more responsible for their own behavior problems were less likely to demonstrate treatment success. Additionally, more severe behavior problems were also predictive of treatment success. Clinical and research implications of these results are discussed. The Journal of Genetic

show abstract

“…da je njihovo dete "nepopravljivo" ili da nikada neće biti dovoljno dobro da zadovolji njihove kriterijume) koje indukuju ljutnju i oštre disciplinske postupke i koje pouzdano predviđaju probleme u ponašanju dece u školi (Bugental et al, 1998;Snyder et al, 2005). Dakle, pripisivanje uzroka problematičnog ponašanja samom detetu od strane roditelja verovatno podupire detetovu negativnu sliku o sebi, pri čemu roditelji nisu skloni promeni načina disciplinovanja (Miller & Prinz, 2003), te se neadekvatno ponašanje deteta ispoljava i u školi kroz kršenje školske discipline. Razvijanje osetljivosti roditelja za detetovo ponašanje, razumevanje da se dete drugačije ponaša u različitim situacijama i odustajanje od rigidnosti u načinu kažnjavanja deteta, posledično može dovesti do manjeg rizika za javljanje problema u ponašanju deteta u školi (Snyder et al, 2005).…”

Section: Diskusijaunclassified

Osobine Ličnosti, Načini Kažnjavanja I Školska Nedisciplina

Milovanović

Pekić

Kodžopeljić

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cilj istraživanja prezentovanog u ovom radu usmeren je ka ispitivanju medijacijske uloge osobina ličnosti u relaciji između različitih načina kažnjavanja u porodici i neadekvatnog načina ponašanja u školi. Uzorak je činilo 479 učenika i učenica srednjih škola sa teritorije Srbije. Od ukupnog broja ispitanika 63.5% bilo je ženskog pola, a prosečna starost ispitanika iznosila je 16.76 godina. Osobine ličnosti učenika operacionalizovane su preko dimenzija skraćene verzije upitnika Velikih pet plus dva (VP+2-70), a načini kažnjavanja u porodici mereni su upitnikom Skale kažnjavanja u vaspitanju (SKV). Konstrukt školske nediscipline operacionalizovan je kao jedinstven skor na Skali školske nediscipline (ŠN). Rezultati istraživanja sugerišu postojanje medijacione uloge pojedinih osobina ličnosti između načina kažnjavanja u porodici i školske nediscipline, pri čemu je medijacija osobina ličnosti parcijalnog tipa. Uloga Negativne valence značajna je u relaciji između svih načina kažnjavanja u porodici, izuzev fizičkog, i školske nediscipline, dok Agresivnost ostvaruje značajan efekat u relaciji između verbalnog i separacionog kažnjavanja kao prediktora, i školske nediscipline kao kriterijuma.

show abstract

Engagement of families in treatment for childhood conduct problems

Cited by 113 publications

References 42 publications

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Predicting Treatment Success in Child and Parent Therapy Among Families in Poverty

Osobine Ličnosti, Načini Kažnjavanja I Školska Nedisciplina

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About