2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403342101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement of B7 on effector T cells by regulatory T cells prevents autoimmune disease

Abstract: Although there is considerable evidence that a subpopulation of regulatory CD4 ؉ CD25 ؉ T cells can suppress the response of autoreactive T cells, the underlying molecular mechanism is not understood. We find that transmission of a suppressive signal by CD4CD25 ؉ regulatory cells requires engagement of the B7 molecule expressed on target T cells. The response of T cells from B7-deficient mice is resistant to suppression in vitro, and these cells provoke a lethal wasting disease in lymphopenic mice despite the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
203
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
203
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our observation in this regard is preliminary in scope and limited to the target tissue, and thus does not invalidate the hypothesis that CTLA4 expressed by T reg cells may bind to CD80/CD86 on T eff cells to facilitate direct cellular interactions (Paust et al, 2004). On the other hand, the data from our studies suggest that CTLA4 might affect T reg -T eff cell interaction through other mechanisms.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our observation in this regard is preliminary in scope and limited to the target tissue, and thus does not invalidate the hypothesis that CTLA4 expressed by T reg cells may bind to CD80/CD86 on T eff cells to facilitate direct cellular interactions (Paust et al, 2004). On the other hand, the data from our studies suggest that CTLA4 might affect T reg -T eff cell interaction through other mechanisms.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…A previous study (Paust et al, 2004) reported that CD80/CD86-deficient T eff cells were resistant to T reg cell suppression. We explored along this line but did not detect expression of CD80 or CD86 on T reg cells or T eff cells in the target tissues by cytolableing in situ with specific antibodies, T eff cells (n = 3 mice, 40 cells, mean ± SEM) in ACE islet grafts in B6 mice is compared with that of CD4 + BDC2.5 T cells in ACE islet grafts in NOD.…”
Section: Ar Ticlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4B). Importantly, B7.1 and B7.2 surface expression was clearly detectable on both CD25 -CD4 + responder T cells as well as in CD25 + CD4 + T R cells (data not shown) [26,39]. Next, we asked whether B7 expression on activated T cells is necessary to effect T Rsuppressive activity using cells from B7-deficient mice (B7DKO).…”
Section: Absence Of B7 From Responder T Cells Accounts For Limited Icmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IDO does not seem to be an exclusive mechanism of suppression since direct T R -mediated suppression can be achieved even in the absence of APC at least in vitro [24]. Additional evidence supports the possibility of a similar direct effect on T cells, which up-regulate both B7.1 and B7.2 following TCR activation [25,26]. Therefore, B7 expression on T cells is likely to be relevant since T R cells effectively limit B7 expression on DC [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of these molecules from effector T cells reduced the cell susceptibility to the suppression by CD4 þ CD25 þ Treg. 12,13 In addition, some members of Tolllike receptor (TLR), which constitutively expressed on Treg, such as TLR 2 and TLR8, might participate in the Treg activation and expansion. [14][15][16] Cytolytic activity was invoked as a possible mechanism of suppression by Treg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%