1995
DOI: 10.21432/t2vg77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement as a Design Concept for Multimedia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
83
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Learning engagement has been studied unidimensionally, as depth-of-processing, time-on-task, or intrinsic motivation (e.g., Jacques, Preece, & Carey, 1995;Kumar, 1991;Martens et al, 1997;Skinner & Belmont, 1993). However, such notions can mask engagement's complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning engagement has been studied unidimensionally, as depth-of-processing, time-on-task, or intrinsic motivation (e.g., Jacques, Preece, & Carey, 1995;Kumar, 1991;Martens et al, 1997;Skinner & Belmont, 1993). However, such notions can mask engagement's complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item had to be assessed on a 10-point numerical scale ranging from 1 (left) to 10 (right). The list included items assessing selfconfidence, ease and efficiency (White 1959;Skinner 1996;Ajzen 2002;Hedman and Sharafi 2004), and items assessing the experience of enjoyment, motivation, challenge, excitement, skill development and discovering new possibilities (Malone 1981;Csikszentmihalyi 1990;Webster et al 1993;Jacques et al 1995;Laurel 1991;Chapman et al 1999;Garris 2002). …”
Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature on interaction design, engagement is described as an exciting and enjoyable state of mind in which attention is willingly given and held (Malone 1981;Laurel 1991;Webster et al 1993;Jacques et al 1995;Chapman et al 1999), and was also specifically discussed in relation to web applications (Chen et al 1999;Novak et al 2000) and interactive training simulations (Garris et al 2002). In studies on well-being, engagement has also been described as an optimal state of mind, called Flow, in which people report experiencing a sense of enjoyment, losing the sense of self and time, and experiencing effortlessness in the development of skills (Csikszentmihalyi 1990;Ellis et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides its essential roles in general work context, engagement is also considered as a desirable user response to computermediated activities in the context of human computer interaction [50]. Users describe their engaging experiences of interacting with IS as feelings that the system has caught, captured, and captivated their interest [39]. Users are engaged in a system when it "holds their attention and they are attracted to it for intrinsic rewards" [39, p. 58].…”
Section: Conceptualizations Of Engagement In the Is Use Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%